Gender studies show that negative and irritable temperament in infants and toddlers are predictors of increased risks of what in adolescent boys?
Psychotic behaviors
Oppositional behaviors
Illegal behaviors
Abusive behaviors
The CFRP framework includes understanding developmental risk factors to support health and wellness. Gender studies cited in the CFRP study guide indicate that negative and irritable temperament in infants and toddlers is a predictor of oppositional behaviors in adolescent boys, such as defiance and aggression, which are characteristic of conditions like Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). The guide states, “Negative and irritable temperament in early childhood is a risk factor for oppositional behaviors in adolescent boys, often manifesting as defiance or conflict with authority.” Psychotic behaviors (option A) are linked to severe mental illnesses, not temperament. Illegal (option C) and abusive behaviors (option D) may occur later but are not directly predicted by early temperament as strongly as oppositional behaviors.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “Gender studies highlight that negative and irritable temperament in infants and toddlers predicts increased risk of oppositional behaviors in adolescent boys, such as defiance and aggression.”
A practitioner is completing an assessment with a child who recently experienced a traumatic event. The child is avoiding questions related to the event. The practitioner should
ask the parent about the child’s trauma.
allow the child to disclose at his own pace.
refer the child to a therapist.
continue questioning the child about the trauma.
Trauma-informed care is a cornerstone of supporting health and wellness in the CFRP framework. When a child who has experienced a traumatic event avoids discussing it during an assessment, the practitioner should allow the child to disclose at their own pace, respecting their emotional readiness and avoiding re-traumatization. The CFRP study guide emphasizes, “In trauma-informed assessments, practitioners should allow children to disclose details of traumatic events at their own pace to ensure safety and trust.” Asking the parent (option A) may be a secondary step but bypasses the child’s autonomy. Referring to a therapist (option C) or continuing questioning (option D) may be premature or harmful without first establishing trust.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “When a child avoids discussing a traumatic event during assessment, practitioners should allow disclosure at the child’s own pace, prioritizing safety and trust in trauma-informed care.”
During a session, a child receiving services becomes verbally aggressive, insulting, and threatening. The practitioner’s initial effort to de-escalate the situation would be to
ignore the behaviors and continue the session.
establish boundaries using a loud and firm voice.
practice safety first and remove himself from the situation.
respond slowly and confidently in a gentle, caring way.
Interpersonal competencies in the CFRP framework include managing challenging behaviors with de-escalation techniques. When a child becomes verbally aggressive, insulting, and threatening, the practitioner’s initial effort to de-escalate is to respond slowly and confidently in a gentle, caring way, which helps calm the situation and maintain trust. The CFRP study guide states, “To de-escalate verbal aggression in a session, practitioners should initially respond slowly and confidently in a gentle, caring manner to reduce tension and preserve the therapeutic relationship.” Ignoring behaviors (option A) may escalate the situation. Using a loud voice (option B) can intensify aggression. Removing oneself (option C) is a last resort if safety is at risk, not the initial step.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Interpersonal Competencies): “The initial de-escalation strategy for a child’s verbal aggression is to respond slowly and confidently in a gentle, caring way, promoting calm and maintaining trust.”
A practitioner is working with a transition-age youth who is unable to self-soothe during periods of distress. What would be an effective intervention?
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to reduce stress.
implementing exposure therapy techniques.
teaching progressive muscle relaxation techniques.
referring for medication management.
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:
Supporting transition-age youth in the CFRP framework includes teaching practical coping strategies that allow the youth to self-regulate during periods of distress. Teaching progressive muscle relaxation techniques is an effective, evidence-based intervention for self-soothing, as it provides a tangible skill to manage distress. The CFRP study guide notes, “For transition-age youth struggling to self-soothe during distress, teaching progressive relaxation techniques is an effective intervention to promote emotional regulation.” Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (option A) would take a longer time to address underlying issues and would not be as immediately effective as muscle relaxation techniques to address the distress. Exposure therapy (option B) is specific to anxiety disorders and may not apply to general distress. Referring for medication (option D) may be considered but is not the first-line intervention for teaching self-soothing skills.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Transition-Age Youth Services): “Teaching progressive relaxation techniques is an effective intervention for transition-age youth unable to self-soothe during distress, enhancing emotional self-regulation.”
What factors must be understood when considering typical childhood development?
Education and learning needs
Context and culture
Nature and environment
Gender and birth order
TheSupporting Health and Wellnessdomain requires practitioners to understand developmental factors to tailor interventions. ThePRA CFRP Study Guide 2024-2025emphasizes thatcontext and cultureare critical in assessing typical childhood development, as they shape social, emotional, and behavioral norms.
OptionB(Context and culture) is correct because the PRA framework highlights the importance of cultural values, family dynamics, and environmental context in understanding developmental milestones and behaviors.
OptionA(Education and learning needs) is incorrect because, while important, these are secondary to broader contextual factors in developmental assessment.
OptionC(Nature and environment) is incorrect because “nature” is vague, and the PRA prioritizes culture over general environmental factors.
OptionD(Gender and birth order) is incorrect because, while influential, these are not the primary factors compared to context and culture in the PRA guidelines.
Supporting transition-age youth in their efforts to understand how media, music, and beliefs impact their interpretation of mental health challenges is an example of
cultural competency.
collaborative understanding.
supportive therapy.
social networking.
Within the CFRP framework, transition-age youth services emphasize culturally competent practices that address how societal and cultural factors influence mental health. Supporting youth in understanding how media, music, and beliefs shape their mental health perceptions is an example of cultural competency, as it involves exploring cultural influences on their worldview. The CFRP study guide notes, “Cultural competency includes helping transition-age youth understand how media, music, and cultural beliefs impact their interpretation of mental health challenges.” Collaborative understanding (option B) is not a recognized term. Supportive therapy (option C) is a clinical intervention, not specific to cultural factors. Social networking (option D) involves peer connections, not cultural analysis.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Transition-Age Youth Services): “Cultural competency involves supporting transition-age youth in exploring how media, music, and beliefs influence their understanding of mental health challenges.”
When nurturing problem-solving abilities in children with autism spectrum disorders, it is important to
provide unconditional support of their decisions.
define the possible consequences of their actions.
engage them in thinking about possible solutions.
offer them frequent reminders about what to do.
Supporting health and wellness for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) involves fostering skills like problem-solving in a way that respects their unique needs. Engaging children with ASD in thinking about possible solutions encourages critical thinking and autonomy, which are essential for developing problem-solving abilities. The CFRP study guide emphasizes, “To nurture problem-solving in children with autism spectrum disorders, practitioners should engage them in thinking about possible solutions, promoting independence and cognitive flexibility.” Unconditional support of decisions (option A) may undermine learning by not addressing consequences. Defining consequences (option B) is a secondary step after solution exploration. Frequent reminders (option D) may reduce independence and are less effective for building problem-solving skills.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “Nurturing problem-solving in children with autism spectrum disorders involves engaging them in thinking about possible solutions to foster independence and cognitive growth.”
To communicate empathically, the listener needs to go through which of the following cycles?
Encouraging, assuring, and responding
Maintaining eye contact, considering feelings, and sympathizing
Respecting, acknowledging, and repeating back
Attending, understanding, and responding
Empathic communication is a cornerstone of theInterpersonal Competenciesdomain, emphasizing the practitioner’s ability to connect with children and families in a supportive, non-judgmental manner. According to thePRA CFRP Study Guide 2024-2025, empathic listening involves a cycle ofattending(actively focusing on the speaker),understanding(grasping the speaker’s emotions and perspective), andresponding(providing feedback that validates the speaker’s feelings). This cycle fosters trust and ensures the speaker feels heard.
OptionD(Attending, understanding, and responding) is correct because it directly reflects the PRA’s framework for empathic communication. The study guide specifies that attending includes nonverbal cues like nodding, understanding involves interpreting both verbal and emotional content, and responding entails verbal affirmations or reflective statements.
OptionA(Encouraging, assuring, and responding) is incorrect because, while encouraging and assuring are supportive, they are not specific to the empathic listening cycle. The PRA framework prioritizes understanding over assurance.
OptionB(Maintaining eye contact, considering feelings, and sympathizing) is incorrect because maintaining eye contact is not universally appropriate (as noted in Question 1) and sympathizing focuses on the listener’s emotions rather than the speaker’s. The PRA emphasizes empathy (understanding the speaker’s perspective) over sympathy.
OptionC(Respecting, acknowledging, and repeating back) is partially correct but incomplete. While acknowledging and repeating back (reflective listening) are components of empathy, “respecting” is too broad and not a specific phase of the empathic cycle per PRA guidelines.
According to the Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) Study, adverse childhood experiences can BEST be reversed by
a consistent nurturing person.
a biological family member.
residential treatment programs.
ongoing therapeutic interventions.
In the CFRP framework, supporting health and wellness includes addressing the impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) as identified in the ACE Study. The study emphasizes that the presence of a consistent nurturing person, such as a supportive caregiver or mentor, is the most effective way to mitigate the long-term effects of ACEs by fostering resilience and emotional security. The CFRP study guide states, “According to the ACE Study, the effects of adverse childhood experiences are best reversed by a consistent nurturing person who provides emotional support and stability.” A biological family member (option B) is not necessarily required, as the key is nurturing support. Residential treatment (option C) and ongoing therapy (option D) may help but are less impactful than a nurturing relationship.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “The ACE Study highlights that a consistent nurturing person is the most effective means to reverse the impacts of adverse childhood experiences, promoting resilience through stable support.”
Assessment, planning, linking, and monitoring are core functions of
medication management.
psychiatric care.
care coordination.
case management.
In the CFRP framework, community integration involves connecting families to resources through structured processes. Assessment, planning, linking, and monitoring are core functions of case management, which ensures families access appropriate services and supports. The CFRP study guide states, “Case management includes the core functions of assessment, planning, linking, and monitoring to connect children and families with community resources.” Medication management (option A) focuses on pharmaceuticals, psychiatric care (option B) involves clinical treatment, and care coordination (option C) is a broader term that overlaps but is less specific than case management.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Community Integration): “The core functions of case management—assessment, planning, linking, and monitoring—facilitate access to community resources for children and families.”
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy is an evidence-based practice that is effective for children diagnosed with depression, trauma, or
learning disorders.
conduct disorders.
anxiety disorders.
delusional disorders.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a well-established evidence-based practice within the CFRP framework for supporting health and wellness, particularly for children with mental health challenges. CBT is highly effective for depression, trauma, and anxiety disorders, as it helps children modify negative thought patterns and develop coping strategies. The CFRP study guide notes that “CBT is an evidence-based intervention proven effective for children with depression, trauma, and anxiety disorders, addressing emotional and behavioral challenges through structured techniques.” While CBT may be adapted for conduct disorders (option B), it is less commonly cited as a primary intervention compared to anxiety disorders. Learning disorders (option A) typically require educational interventions, and delusional disorders (option D) are more associated with severe mental illnesses that may require different approaches, such as medication or specialized therapies.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is an evidence-based practice effective for children diagnosed with depression, trauma, and anxiety disorders, helping them manage emotions and behaviors.”
Transition-age youth are able to gain psychosocial protective factors as well as neurophysiological buffering through which of the following?
Consistent relationships with caring individuals
Caregiving for younger siblings
Involvement in the child protective system
Connection to a peer network
In the CFRP framework, transition-age youth services focus on fostering protective factors to support mental health and resilience. Consistent relationships with caring individuals, such as mentors or supportive adults, provide psychosocial protective factors (e.g., emotional support) and neurophysiological buffering (e.g., reducing stress responses). The CFRP study guide states, “Transition-age youth gain psychosocial protective factors and neurophysiological buffering through consistent relationships with caring individuals, which mitigate stress and enhance resilience.” Caregiving for siblings (option B) may build responsibility but is less directly linked to neurophysiological benefits. Involvement in child protective services (option C) is often a risk factor, not a protective one. Peer networks (option D) are supportive but less impactful than adult relationships.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Transition-Age Youth Services): “Consistent relationships with caring individuals provide transition-age youth with psychosocial protective factors and neurophysiological buffering, reducing stress and promoting resilience.”
A practitioner is working with a child who is being bullied at school. How can the practitioner promote resiliency?
Encourage the child to take a self-defense class and confront the bully.
Reframe the child’s experience and encourage a positive self-view.
Revisit the experience and have the child explain the details.
Encourage the child to avoid the bully and make new friends.
Promoting resiliency is a key focus of theStrategies for Facilitating Recoverydomain, which emphasizes strengths-based interventions to help children overcome adversity. ThePRA CFRP Study Guide 2024-2025defines resiliency as the ability to adapt and thrive despite challenges, such as bullying. Practitioners should use interventions that empower the child, reinforce self-worth, and reframe negative experiences to foster a positive self-concept.
OptionB(Reframe the child’s experience and encourage a positive self-view) is correct. The PRA guidelines advocate for cognitive reframing, where the practitioner helps the child view the bullyingexperience as a challenge they can overcome, rather than a reflection of their worth. Encouraging a positive self-view aligns with strengths-based practices, such as affirming the child’s strengths and building self-esteem.
OptionA(Encourage the child to take a self-defense class and confront the bully) is incorrect because confrontation may escalate the situation and is not a trauma-informed or resiliency-focused approach. The PRA Code of Ethics emphasizes non-violent, collaborative solutions.
OptionC(Revisit the experience and have the child explain the details) is incorrect because repeatedly recounting traumatic events without therapeutic processing can re-traumatize the child. The PRA study guide advises against dwelling on negative details without a strengths-based focus.
OptionD(Encourage the child to avoid the bully and make new friends) is incorrect because avoidance does not address the child’s emotional needs or build resiliency. While making new friends is positive, it does not tackle the underlying impact of bullying, which the PRA framework prioritizes.
When expanding mental health programming for children and families, it is essential that children
are informed of all of their available treatment options and risks.
are maintained in their home environment to avoid disruption.
be placed in residential treatment to achieve the best outcomes.
be identified early and provided with effective services and supports.
Systems competencies in the CFRP framework focus on improving mental health service delivery through proactive and effective programming. When expanding mental health programming, it is essential to identify children early and provide them with effective services and supports to prevent escalation of issues and promote recovery. The CFRP study guide states, “Expanding mental health programming requires early identification of children’s needs and the provision of effective services and supports to ensure positive outcomes.” Informing of treatment options (option A) is important but secondary to early intervention. Maintaining home environments (option B) is ideal but not always feasible. Residential treatment (option C) is a last resort, not a primary strategy.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Systems Competencies): “Essential to expanding mental health programming is the early identification of children and the delivery of effective services and supports to promote recovery and resilience.”
Generational poverty is defined as a
life event that causes poverty for a family lasting up to 20 years.
downward trend in socio-economic status.
family having been in poverty for two or more generations.
financial event affecting an entire generation.
Systems competencies in the CFRP framework include understanding socio-economic factors like generational poverty, which impacts family resilience. Generational poverty is defined as a family having been in poverty for two or more generations, reflecting entrenched economic challenges. The CFRP study guide states, “Generational poverty is defined as a family experiencing poverty for two or more consecutive generations, creating systemic barriers to resilience.” A life event causing poverty (option A) or a financial event (option D) is situational, not generational. A downward trend (option B) is too vague to define generational poverty.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Systems Competencies): “Generational poverty refers to a family having been in poverty for two or more generations, posing significant systemic challenges to family well-being.”
The skill of self-monitoring in relation to executive functioning is MOST evident in which of the following academic subjects?
Art and music
Math and writing
History and literature
Science and technology
TheSupporting Health and Wellnessdomain includes promoting cognitive and behavioral skills, such as executive functioning, which encompasses self-monitoring (the ability to track and regulate one’s performance). ThePRA CFRP Study Guide 2024-2025explains that self-monitoring is critical in structured, sequential tasks requiring planning, organization, and error correction, such as those found in math and writing.
OptionB(Math and writing) is correct. Math requires self-monitoring to check calculations and follow multi-step processes, while writing involves planning, drafting, and revising, all of whichdemand self-regulation. The PRA study guide highlights these subjects as prime examples where executive functioning deficits are evident and can be supported.
OptionA(Art and music) is incorrect because, while creative, these subjects rely more on expression than structured self-monitoring. The PRA framework notes they engage different cognitive processes.
OptionC(History and literature) is incorrect because these subjects focus on comprehension and analysis, with less emphasis on sequential self-monitoring compared to math and writing.
OptionD(Science and technology) is partially correct, as science involves some self-monitoring (e.g., experiments), but it is less consistent than math and writing. The PRA study guide prioritizes math and writing for executive functioning.
Reform, when referenced with expanding home and community-based services, often comes in response to
educational initiatives.
economic decline.
population growth.
legal action.
Within the CFRP framework, systems competencies include understanding the broader systemic factors that influence service delivery, such as policy and legal frameworks. Reforms expanding home and community-based services often arise in response to legal action, such as court rulings or settlements that mandate improved access to community-based care over institutionalization. The CFRP study guide highlights that “legal actions, including lawsuits and advocacy efforts, have historically driven reforms to expand home and community-based services, ensuring compliance with federal mandates like the Olmstead decision.” Educational initiatives (option A), economic decline (option B), and population growth (option C) may influence service needs but are not the primary drivers of such reforms compared to legal mandates.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Systems Competencies): “Reforms expanding home and community-based services are often prompted by legal action, such as court rulings or advocacy efforts, to ensure equitable access to care.”
Playing card games with a transition-age youth is a cognitive training exercise that increases
intellect.
memory.
social communication.
peer support.
Within the CFRP framework, transition-age youth services include activities like cognitive training to enhance mental skills. Playing card games is a cognitive training exercise that primarily increases memory, as it requires recalling rules, strategies, and card sequences. The CFRP study guide notes, “Playing card games with transition-age youth serves as a cognitive training exercise that enhances memory by engaging recall and strategic thinking.” Intellect (option A) is too broad, social communication (option C) is a secondary benefit, and peer support (option D) is unrelated to the cognitive focus of card games.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Transition-Age Youth Services): “Card games are effective cognitive training exercises for transition-age youth, primarily increasing memory through engagement with rules and sequences.”
When collaborating with a child, the established goals should be
precise and confidential.
general and time-framed.
specific and measurable.
open-ended and flexible.
In the CFRP framework, assessment, planning, and outcomes emphasize collaborative goal-setting with children. Goals established with a child should be specific and measurable to ensure clarity and track progress effectively. The CFRP study guide states, “When collaborating with a child, goals must be specific and measurable to provide clear direction and allow for evaluation of progress toward recovery.” Precise and confidential (option A) is partially correct but less accurate, as confidentiality is a separate concern. General and time-framed (option B) or open-ended and flexible (option D) goals lack the precision needed for effective planning and outcomes.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Assessment, Planning, and Outcomes): “Collaborative goal-setting with children requires goals to be specific and measurable to ensure clarity and facilitate progress tracking in the recovery process.”
Assessment of suicidal risk is important because
non-suicidal self-harm should not be considered a predictive suicide risk factor.
there is a continuum of suicidality that determines the level of risk for children.
there is a need to distinguish between attention-seeking behavior and suicidality.
children with suicidal thoughts frequently make an attempt within days of the disclosure.
In the CFRP framework, assessment, planning, and outcomes include thorough evaluation of suicidal risk to ensure appropriate interventions. Assessing suicidal risk is critical because there is a continuum of suicidality, ranging from ideation to attempts, which helps determine the level of risk and guide interventions for children. The CFRP study guide states, “Suicidal risk assessment is essential due to the continuum of suicidality, which allows practitioners to determine the level of risk and tailor interventions accordingly.” Non-suicidal self-harm (option A) is a risk factor, contrary to the statement. Distinguishing attention-seeking behavior (option C) is relevant but secondary. Immediate attempts (option D) are not universally true and overstate the timeline.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Assessment, Planning, and Outcomes): “Assessment of suicidal risk is critical because suicidality exists on a continuum, enabling practitioners to gauge risk levels and implement appropriate supports for children.”
Which of the following are included in the eight dimensions of wellness?
Safety, academic, and spiritual
Academic, social, and safety
Spiritual, physical, and social
Physical, academic, and emotional
The CFRP framework incorporates the eight dimensions of wellness to guide health and wellness interventions. These dimensions include spiritual, physical, social, emotional, intellectual, occupational, environmental, and financial wellness. The correct option includes spiritual, physical, and social, which are part of the eight dimensions. The CFRP study guide notes, “The eight dimensions of wellness include spiritual, physical, and social wellness, among others, providing a holistic framework for well-being.” Safety (options A and B) and academic (options A, B, and D) are not among the eight dimensions, though emotional (option D) is included but paired incorrectly.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “The eight dimensions of wellness encompass spiritual, physical, social, emotional, intellectual, occupational, environmental, and financial wellness.”
Between the ages of five and twelve years, a child is typically
exploring interpersonal skills through initiating activities.
developing skills and a sense of pride in accomplishments.
forming an attachment to caregivers and teachers.
coming to terms with emerging sexuality.
Supporting health and wellness in the CFRP framework includes understanding developmental stages. Between ages five and twelve, children are typically in Erikson’s industry vs. inferiority stage, developing skills and a sense of pride in accomplishments through tasks like schoolwork and hobbies. The CFRP study guide notes, “From ages five to twelve, children focus on developing skills and a sense of pride in accomplishments, building competence and self-esteem.” Exploring interpersonal skills (option A) is less specific, forming attachments (option C) is more relevant to earlier stages, and emerging sexuality (option D) typically occurs in adolescence.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “Children aged five to twelve typically develop skills and pride in accomplishments, aligning with the industry vs. inferiority developmental stage.”
The MOST significant factor contributing to a child’s healthy growth and well-being is
socioeconomic status.
culture.
strong relationships.
genetics.
Supporting health and wellness in the CFRP framework emphasizes the foundational role of relationships in child development. Strong relationships, particularly with caregivers and supportive adults, are the most significant factor contributing to a child’s healthy growth and well-being, providing emotional security and resilience. The CFRP study guide notes, “Strong relationships with caregivers and supportive adults are the most significant factor in promoting a child’s healthy growth and well-being, fostering emotional and social development.” Socioeconomic status (option A), culture (option B), and genetics (option D) influence well-being but are secondary to the impact of relationships.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “The most significant factor for a child’s healthy growth and well-being is strong relationships, which provide the emotional foundation for resilience and development.”
Defining the limits of exchanging information with persons outside of the treatment team is an example of
self-determination.
shared decision-making.
informed consent.
protecting confidentiality.
Professional role competencies in the CFRP framework include adhering to ethical standards, such as protecting confidentiality. Defining the limits of exchanging information with persons outside the treatment team is a clear example of protecting confidentiality, ensuring client privacy and trust. The CFRP study guide states, “Protecting confidentiality involves defining the limits of information exchange with individuals outside the treatment team to maintain client trust and ethical practice.” Self-determination (option A) relates to client autonomy, shared decision-making (option B) involves collaborative choices, and informed consent (option C) pertains to agreeing to treatment, none of which directly address information limits.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Professional Role Competencies): “Defining the limits of exchanging information with persons outside the treatment team is a key aspect of protecting confidentiality, ensuring ethical and trustworthy practice.”
Mental health treatment is expanding to include
school modifications.
individualized goal planning.
peer-to-peer support.
functional family therapy.
The CFRP framework highlights the expansion of mental health treatment to include evidence-based practices that address family dynamics. Functional family therapy (FFT) is a recognized intervention being increasingly integrated into mental health treatment for children and youth, focusing on improving family relationships and communication. The CFRP study guide explains, “Mental health treatment is expanding to include functional family therapy, which targets family dynamics to support child and adolescent recovery.” School modifications (option A) are accommodations, not treatments. Individualized goal planning (option B) is part of treatment but not a specific expansion. Peer-to-peer support (option C) is valuable but less central than FFT in treatment expansion.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “The expansion of mental health treatment includes functional family therapy, an evidence-based approach that strengthens family relationships to support recovery.”
The concept of person-first language is founded in
the limits of disability.
the need for accommodation.
political correctness.
respect for differences.
The CFRP framework emphasizes cultural competence and respectful communication within interpersonal competencies. Person-first language, which prioritizes the individual over their disability or condition (e.g., “a child with autism” rather than “an autistic child”), is founded in respect for differences. This approach acknowledges the dignity and individuality of each person. The CFRP study guide states, “Person-first language is rooted in respect for differences, emphasizing the individual’s humanity and unique qualities over their condition or disability.” The limits of disability (option A) or the need for accommodation (option B) are not the foundation, though they may relate to its application. Political correctness (option C) is a mischaracterization, as person-first language is about dignity, not superficial compliance.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Interpersonal Competencies): “The concept of person-first language is founded in respect for differences, promoting dignity by prioritizing the individual’s identity over their disability or condition.”
Family enmeshment describes the
extent of the family’s involvement in the community.
extent of the family’s involvement in treatment.
lack of individuation of family members.
lack of quality family interpersonal communication.
In the CFRP framework, interpersonal competencies include understanding family dynamics, such as enmeshment. Family enmeshment describes a lack of individuation among family members, where boundaries are blurred, and individual identities are overly intertwined, often impacting emotional health. The CFRP study guide states, “Family enmeshment refers to a lack of individuation among family members, characterized by overly close emotional bonds and weak personal boundaries.” Involvement in the community (option A) or treatment (option B) does not define enmeshment. Poor communication (option D) may be a consequence but is not the core definition.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Interpersonal Competencies): “Family enmeshment is defined as a lack of individuation among family members, where emotional boundaries are blurred, impacting family functioning.”
A 13-year-old boy, who is new to the community and school, is found intoxicated in the school bathroom. What is the BEST course of action for the practitioner to take?
Convene a meeting with the child, his family, and school officials.
Refer the child to substance abuse treatment services.
Report the child’s behavior to law enforcement.
Encourage school officials to expel the child.
In the CFRP framework, assessment, planning, and outcomes require a collaborative and family-driven approach to address concerning behaviors like substance use. For a 13-year-old found intoxicated, the best initial action is to convene a meeting with the child, family, and school officials to assess the situation, understand underlying factors, and develop a plan. The CFRP study guide notes, “When a child exhibits concerning behaviors such as substance use, the practitioner should first convene a collaborative meeting with the child, family, and relevant stakeholders to assess needs and plan interventions.” Immediate referral to treatment (option B) may follow but requires assessment first. Reporting to law enforcement (option C) or encouraging expulsion (option D) are punitive and not aligned with CFRP’s strengths-based approach.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Assessment, Planning, and Outcomes): “For incidents involving substance use, the practitioner’s best course of action is to convene a meeting with the child, family, and school officials to collaboratively assess the situation and plan appropriate interventions.”
Once regarded as the primary cause of a child's challenges, who are now seen as key collaborators in the development of the child's resilience?
Parents
Clergy
Teachers
Doctors
The CFRP framework emphasizes the shift in perspective from viewing parents as the cause of a child’s challenges to recognizing them as key collaborators in fostering resilience. This aligns with the family-driven approach central to interpersonal competencies, which prioritizes partnership with parents to support child recovery. The CFRP study guide states, “Historically, parents were often blamed for their child’s challenges, but current practice recognizes parents as essential collaborators in building resilience and promoting recovery.” Clergy (option B), teachers (option C), and doctors (option D) may play supportive roles, but parents are uniquely positioned as primary caregivers and partners in the child’s daily life and recovery process.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Interpersonal Competencies): “Parents, once seen as the primary cause of a child’s challenges, are now valued as key collaborators in developing resilience and supporting recovery through family-driven practices.”
The approach that involves collaboration across agencies at the direction of families and transition-age youth is
systems of care.
community coordination network.
continuity of care.
recovery support systems.
Systems competencies in the CFRP framework include understanding coordinated service models. The systems of care approach involves collaboration across agencies, directed by families and transition-age youth, to provide individualized, community-based support. The CFRP study guide states, “The systems of care approach is characterized by collaboration across agencies, guided by the preferences and needs of families and transition-age youth, to deliver comprehensive services.” Community coordination network (option B) is not a standard term. Continuity of care (option C) focuses on service consistency, not agency collaboration. Recovery support systems (option D) are broader and less specific to family-directed collaboration.
CFRP Study Guide (Section on Systems Competencies): “Systems of care involve collaboration across agencies at the direction of families and transition-age youth, ensuring individualized and community-based support.”
Copyright © 2014-2025 Certensure. All Rights Reserved