Isaca COBIT-2019 COBIT 2019 Foundation Exam Practice Test

 According to the COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, one of the good practices with regard to performance management of organizational structures is to ensure that organizational meeting reports/minutes are available and meaningful to ensure transparency. This means that the outcomes and decisions of the meetings are documented and communicated to relevant stakeholders in a timely manner, and that they provide sufficient information to support accountability and learning. Transparency is one of the key principles of effective governance of enterprise I&T.4, p. 32-33 References: 4: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives

 The COBIT 2019 publication that includes a workflow for planning a tailored governance system for the enterprise is COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. This publication provides guidance on how to design a customized governance system for information and technology using COBIT as a reference framework. It includes a workflow for planning a tailored governance system for the enterprise that consists of seven steps: define design factors; define focus areas; define current state; define target state; identify gaps; define roadmap; select implementation method.14 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution

The responsibility for overseeing EGIT structures lies with the board, according to COBIT 2019. The board ensures that the enterprise’s IT governance aligns with strategic objectives, monitors compliance, and oversees risk management. This aligns with the Evaluate, Direct, and Monitor (EDM) domain, which assigns the board the role of setting direction, making high-level decisions, and assessing IT governance effectiveness to align with overall enterprise strategy​.

In COBIT 2019, "Time-to-market" is closely associated with the enterprise goal of maintaining a portfolio of competitive products and services. This metric reflects the enterprise’s ability to deliver new offerings to the market efficiently, which is essential for competitive advantage. The COBIT goals cascade links time-to-market to this objective, emphasizing the importance of quick responsiveness to market demands as part of enterprise strategy​.

 The focus areas are specific governance topics that are relevant for an enterprise based on its context, needs, and objectives. The focus areas provide guidance on how to apply the COBIT 2019 framework to address specific issues or challenges related to information and technology governance. The focus areas also help to tailor the COBIT 2019 framework to suit the enterprise’s specific governance system design. Therefore, when an enterprise is designing a specific governance system that is using diverse technology deployments with multiple domains of business operations, the expected deliverable when tailoring the COBIT 2019 framework is the focus area guidance. The focus area guidance will help the enterprise to select and prioritize the relevant focus areas that match its governance needs and objectives, and to customize the COBIT 2019 components such as principles, enablers, goals, processes, practices, etc., according to the focus area requirements12 References: 1: COBIT 2019 Design Guide, page 51-52 2: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, page 27-28

The enterprise strategy archetype is a design factor that describes how an enterprise uses information and technology to achieve its goals and objectives. There are six enterprise strategy archetypes defined in COBIT 2019: growth/acquisition; operational excellence; customer intimacy; product leadership; data-driven; innovation-driven. Each archetype has different implications for the governance and management of information and technology in terms of focus areas, processes, practices, roles, structures, and metrics. One of the important components for an enterprise strategy archetype of growth/acquisition is support for the portfolio management role with an investment office. Growth/acquisition is a strategy archetype that emphasizes expanding market share, revenue, customer base, or product range through organic growth or acquisition of other businesses or assets. This strategy archetype requires effective portfolio management of information and technology investments and initiatives that support business growth or acquisition objectives. Portfolio management involves selecting, prioritizing, balancing, monitoring, evaluating, and optimizing information and technology investments and initiatives based on their alignment with business strategy, value delivery potential, risk exposure, resource availability, interdependencies, etc. Portfolio management also involves ensuring that information and technology investments and initiatives are integrated with business processes, systems, structures, culture, etc., especially in case of mergers or acquisitions. Support for the portfolio management role with an investment office means providing a dedicated function or unit that assists the portfolio manager in performing portfolio management activities such as planning, analysis, decision making, reporting, etc., as well as providing guidance, tools, methods, frameworks, standards, best practices etc., for portfolio management5 References: 5: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: page 35-36 : COBIT 2019 Process Reference Guide: page 59-61

Time-to-market is a market factor that is directly related to the enterprise goal of portfolio of competitive products and services. Time-to-market is the measure of how quickly an enterprise can deliver new or improved products or services to its customers. It affects the competitiveness, profitability, and customer satisfaction of the enterprise. Portfolio of competitive products and services is one of the 17 generic enterprise goals defined by COBIT that describes the desired outcome of providingproducts or services that meet customer needs and expectations, and that are superior to those offered by competitors.13 References: COBIT 2019 Framework:Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives

 A key consideration when finalizing a governance system design with competing priorities is that the enterprise should be prepared to deviate from previously identified priorities with justified reasons. According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, competing priorities are one of the common challenges that enterprises face when designing a governance system. Competing priorities may arise from different stakeholder expectations, requirements, preferences, perspectives, or interests. The COBIT 2019 Design Guide recommends that enterprises use a structured approach to resolve competing priorities, such as the COBIT 2019 Governance System Design Workflow. The workflow helps enterprises to identify and prioritize their improvement opportunities based on a gap analysis between their current and desired states of governance. However, the workflow also allows enterprises to adjust their priorities as needed during the design process, as long as they provide clear and rational reasons for doing so. For example, enterprises may deviate from their initial priorities due to changes in the business environment, stakeholder feedback, new insights, or emerging issues. The deviation from previously identified priorities should be documented and communicated to all relevant stakeholders to ensure transparency and alignment. References: : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 32 2 : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 34

 An enterprise goal is a high-level statement of what the enterprise wants to achieve, aligned with the mission, vision and values of the enterprise. Portfolio of competitive services is an enterprise goal that would most likely be evaluated by using a metric “percent of services that meet or exceed targets in revenues and market share”, as it reflects the need to offer products and services that are attractive to customers and differentiate the enterprise from its competitors2, p. 17. References: 2: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives

According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, the best way for senior leadership to communicate its expectations for IT governance prior to commencing a governance implementation plan is to include a scope statement in the business case. The scope statement defines the boundaries and objectives of the IT governance system, as well as the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved. The scope statement also provides clarity and alignment on what is expected from IT governance and how it will support the enterprise strategy.2, p. 25-26 References: 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing an Information and Technology Governance Solution

 According to the COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, a maturity level is a performance measure that is used to assess a specific focus area. A focus area is a topic that is relevant for governance and management of enterprise information and technology (I&T), such as cybersecurity, privacy or digital transformation. A maturity level indicates the extent to which a focus area is implemented and integrated in the enterprise’s governance system. There are six maturity levels defined in COBIT 2019, ranging from 0 (incomplete) to 5 (optimized).3, p. 77-78 References: 3: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology

 A capability maturity model is a tool that assesses how well a process is implemented and performing at a given level, ranging from 0 (non-existent) to 5 (optimized). Each level defines a set of attributes that describe the characteristics of the process at that level, such as process performance, process documentation, process control, process measurement, etc. The model is based on the COBIT 2019 Process Assessment Model4, page 11. References: 4: COBIT 2019 Process Assessment Model | Digital | English

The size of the enterprise is a design factor that describes the scale or magnitude of an enterprise’s information and technology activities in terms of aspects such as number of employees, customers, locations, products, services, processes, systems, data, etc. The size of the enterprise influences the governance and management of information and technology in terms of the level of complexity, diversity, variability, standardization, centralization, decentralization, etc., that are required for its information and technology activities. The key benefit of considering the size of the enterprise when designing governance is targeting capability levels of governance and management objectives. The capability levels are a measure of how well an enterprise performs its information and technology governance and management processes in terms of process attributes such as process performance, process definition, process deployment, process measurement, process control, process optimization, etc. The capability levels range from 0 (incomplete) to 5 (optimizing), indicating the degree of maturity and effectiveness of an enterprise’s information and technology governance and management processes. The governance and management objectives are the statements of what an enterprise wants to achieve in terms of its information and technology governance. The governance and management objectives are derived from the enterprise goals, which are the high-level statements of what an enterprise wants to achieve in terms of its mission, vision, values, strategy, etc. By considering the size of the enterprise when designing governance, an enterprise can target capability levels of governance and management objectives that are appropriate for its scale and magnitude of information and technology activities. This will also help to optimize its information and technology performance and value delivery12 References: 1: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: page 47-48 2: COBIT 2019 Process Assessment Model: page 11-13

The principle that the governance framework should allow for flexibility in addressing new issues is an important principle of a proper governance framework. A governance framework is a conceptual model or structure that defines the key elements, relationships, and principles of a governance system. A proper governance framework should follow certain principles or guidelines that ensure its effectiveness, efficiency, and alignment with the enterprise goals and objectives. The principle that the governance framework should allow for flexibility in addressing new issues is an important principle of a proper governance framework because it helps to ensure that the governance system can adapt to changes in the internal or external environment, stakeholder needs, business objectives, etc.13 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution

The alignment goal titled “Security of information, processing infrastructure and privacy” is part of the internal dimension of the IT BSC, as it relates to the protection of IT assets and information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, or destruction2, p. 20. References: 2: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives

The initiatives that should be scheduled for completion first when prioritizing improvement initiatives are the ones that are easiest to achieve and will garner business benefits. This approach helps to create quick wins and demonstrate value to the stakeholders, as well as to build momentum and confidence for further improvement efforts. The initiatives should also be aligned with the enterprise’s strategic objectives, risk appetite, and resource constraints. The approach is based on the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide2, page 37. References: 2: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide | Digital | English

According to the COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, one of the imperative factors to the successful implementation of IT governance is that IT governance is sponsored by executives. Executive sponsorship ensures that IT governance has sufficient authority, resources and support from the top management of the organization. Executive sponsorship also demonstrates commitment and leadership for IT governance, and fosters a culture of accountability and collaboration among stakeholders.3, p. 33-34 References: 3: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology

The EGIT business case outline and details are documents that describe the rationale, objectives, scope, approach, benefits, costs, risks, and timeline of the EGIT implementation program. The EGIT business case outline and details provide the basis for obtaining approval, funding, resources, and support for the program from the stakeholders. The responsibility for developing an EGIT business case outline and details resides with the CIO and program steering committee. The CIO is the senior executive responsible for leading and managing the information and technology function in an enterprise. The CIO has a role in developing, reviewing, validating, and approving the EGIT business case outline and details, ensuring that they are aligned with the enterprise’s strategy, objectives, needs, and expectations. The CIO also has a role in communicating and presenting the EGIT business case outline and details to other stakeholders such as the board, executives, business managers, IT managers, etc., and obtaining their buy-in and commitment for the program. The program steering committee is a group of senior stakeholders who provide strategic direction, oversight, guidance, and approval for the EGIT implementation program. The program steering committee has a role in developing, reviewing, validating, and approving the EGIT business case outline and details, ensuring that they are consistent with the enterprise’s vision, mission, values, strategy goals,and objectives. The program steering committee also has a role in monitoring and controlling the execution of the EGIT implementation program plan against the EGIT business case outline and details34 References: 3: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: page 37-38 4: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: page 39-40

The principles, policies and frameworks component of a governance system translates desired behavior into practical guidance. Principles are the fundamental norms or rules that guide decision-making and actions. Policies are the statements of intent or direction that define what is expected or required. Frameworks are the conceptual models or structures that define the key elements, relationships, and principles of a system. The principles, policies and frameworks component of a governance system translates desired behavior into practical guidance by providing a consistent and coherent basis for information and technology governance and management.14 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

Stakeholder drivers and needs must be defined before determining alignment goals. Stakeholder drivers and needs are the requirements or expectations of the internal or external stakeholders of the enterprise, such as customers, employees, shareholders, regulators, etc. Alignment goals are the intermediate goals that link the enterprise goals with the governance and management objectives. Alignment goals are derived from the stakeholder drivers and needs, and they reflect how information and technology can support the enterprise strategy and objectives. Therefore, stakeholder drivers and needs must be defined before alignment goals can be determined.12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

The governance system in COBIT 2019 includes various components that support the effective management and control of enterprise IT. "Services, infrastructure, and applications" is one such component, encompassing the physical and virtual tools required for IT operations. This component ensures that the technology systems align with the enterprise's strategic objectives, as outlined in the COBIT core model (specifically in the framework sections on governance components). This is part of delivering and supporting IT services to meet business needs effectively​.

The risk profile is a design factor that describes how an enterprise identifies, assesses, responds to, monitors, and reports on information and technology risks. The risk profile helps to determine the level of risk appetite and tolerance that an enterprise has for its information and technology activities, as well as the level of control and assurance that is required for its governance framework. When tailoring COBIT 2019 to enterprise requirements, the primary objective of preparing a risk profile is to identify areas of risk that exceed risk appetite. The risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an enterprise is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. The risk appetite provides a basis for defining the risk criteria, thresholds, indicators, and responses that will be used in the risk profile process. By identifying areas of risk that exceed risk appetite, an enterprise can prioritize its governance objectives, processes, practices, roles, structures, and metrics according to the level of risk exposure and impact. This will also help to align the governance framework with the enterprise’s strategy and objectives.

 The accountable (A) role drives a given task or process within an organizational structure chart (RACI chart). A RACI chart is a tool that assigns different levels of responsibility, accountability, consultation, and information to roles and organizational structures for each governance and management objective. The accountable (A) role means being answerable for the outcome or result of a task or process. There should be only one accountable role for each task or process, as having more than one can lead to confusion or conflict. The accountable role drives a given task or process by ensuring that it is performed effectively and efficiently, by providing direction and guidance, by resolving issues or conflicts, by approving changes or exceptions, etc.13 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Roles, Responsibilities & RACI Charts

A fundamental characteristic of the COBIT framework is its clear distinction between governance and management activities. This differentiation is crucial for establishing effective oversight and operational execution within an organization's IT functions.

Governance Activities:These are the responsibilities of the board of directors and involve evaluating strategic options, directing the organization towards achieving objectives, and monitoring performance. Governance ensures that stakeholder needs, conditions, and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-upon enterprise objectives to be achieved.

Management Activities:These are the responsibilities of executive management and involve planning, building, running, and monitoring activities in alignment with the direction set by the governance body to achieve the enterprise objectives.

Option A, "COBIT organizes enterprise business processes," is not accurate. While COBIT provides a framework for IT governance, it does not structure or organize all enterprise business processes.

Option C, "COBIT addresses the activities required to manage all IT within an enterprise," is partially correct but does not capture the essence of the framework's focus on distinguishing governance from management.

Therefore, the characteristic of the COBIT framework is that it distinguishes between governance and management activities, providing a structured approach to align IT processes with enterprise goals.

People, skills and competencies are required for good decisions, execution of corrective actions, and successful completion of all activities. This component acts as a primary driver for corrective actions, making it essential for achieving governance or management objectives.

In COBIT 2019, DevOps is classified as a design factor and a hybrid method. Design factors influence the tailoring of a governance system. As a hybrid method, DevOps combines development and operations practices, emphasizing continuous delivery and integration. This concept aligns with COBIT’s adaptable framework, which accommodates various focus areas and methodologies to enhance agility and responsiveness in IT processes​.

 One of the benefits derived from the use of COBIT is that it helps to ensure compliance with applicable rules and regulations. This benefit is primarily associated with an external stakeholder, such as a regulator, auditor, customer, or partner, who expects the enterprise to adhere to certain standards and requirements. COBIT provides guidance on how to align the governance and management of enterprise IT with relevant laws, regulations, and contractual obligations12. COBIT also helps to establish and maintain a compliance culture and program within the enterprise3. References: 1: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, page 17 2: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, page 19 3: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution, page 77

 A quantitative approach involves numeric mapping tables created for each of the design factors. According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, a quantitative approach is one of the four possible approaches for designing a governance system based on the design factors. A design factor is a characteristic of the enterprise that influences how the governance system should be designed. A quantitative approach uses numeric values to represent the impact of each design factor on the governance components, such as processes, organizational structures, roles, and practices. The numeric values are derived from mapping tables that show how each design factor affects each governance component. The mapping tables are based on empirical data, expert judgment, or best practices. The quantitative approach helps to provide a more objective and consistent way of designing a governance system that is tailored to the enterprise context and needs. References: : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 54 : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 56

The primary objective of reviewing the effectiveness of a new IT governance system that has been operational for 6 months is to identify further governance requirements. An IT governance system is a set of components that provide direction, oversight, evaluation, monitoring, assurance, etc., for an enterprise’s information and technology. The effectiveness of an IT governance system can be reviewed using different methods or tools, such as audits, assessments, surveys, feedbacks, etc. The primary objective of reviewing the effectiveness of a new IT governance system that has been operational for 6 months is to identify further governance requirements that may arise from changes in the internal or external environment, stakeholder needs, business objectives, etc.12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing an Information and Technology Governance Solution

The capability levels are a measure of how well an enterprise performs its information and technology governance and management processes in terms of process attributes such as process performance, process definition, process deployment, process measurement, process control, process optimization etc. The capability levels range from 0 (incomplete) to 5 (optimizing), indicating the degree of maturity and effectiveness of an enterprise’s information and technology governance and management processes. The targeted capability levels are the desired levels of performance that an enterprise wants to achieve for its information and technology governance and management processes, based on its strategy, objectives, needs, and expectations. The targeted capability levels provide a basis for defining the improvement goals and objectives for the processes. The capability-level gap analysis is a process that involves comparing the current capability levels of an enterprise’s information and technology governance and management processes with the targeted capability levels, and identifying the gaps or differences between them. The capability-level gap analysis helps to determine the improvement actions and initiatives that are required to close the gaps and achieve the targeted capability levels. The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is identification of process improvement opportunities. This means that by setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes, an enterprise can identify the areas of weakness or inefficiency in its information and technology governance and management processes, and determine the potential solutions or enhancements that can improve its process performance, quality, value, etc. This will also help to align the information and technology governance system with the enterprise’s strategy and objectives.

According to the COBIT 2019 Process Assessment Model, one of the prerequisites for determining performance measures for a process improvement initiative is to perform a process risk assessment. A process risk assessment identifies and evaluates the potential threats and opportunities that may affect the achievement of process objectives. A process risk assessment also helps to prioritize improvement actions based on their impact and likelihood.4, p. 11-12 References: 4: COBIT 2019 Process Assessment Model: Using COBIT 2019

 COBIT guidance should be customized to meet specific enterprise needs, as different enterprises have different goals, objectives, risks, and requirements. COBIT provides a flexible and adaptable framework that can be tailored to suit the enterprise’s context and environment. COBIT also provides guidance on how to customize the framework using design factors and focus areas.12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution

The information flow and items component of COBIT includes a list of artifacts with links to relevant governance and management practices. An artifact is a tangible or intangible object that is produced, modified, or used by a process or activity. An artifact can be a document, a report, a record, a plan, a policy, a procedure, a service, a product, etc. The information flow and items component of COBIT provides a comprehensive list of artifacts that are relevant for each governance and management objective, as well as links to the practices that produce, modify, or use them.12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

The IT governance implementation approach that should be utilized in order to achieve maximum enterprise benefits is treating implementation as a program. A program is a coordinated set of projects and activities that are designed to achieve a specific set of objectives within a defined scope, time frame, and budget. Treating implementation as a program helps to ensure that IT governance is planned, executed, monitored, controlled, and evaluated in a systematic and consistent manner, following best practices and standards. The approach is based on the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide5, page 29. References: 5: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide | Digital | English

An example of a governance system component is the compliance regulations applicable to the enterprise. The governance system components are the elements that constitute a governance system for an enterprise using COBIT 2019. The governance system components include principles enablers goals processes practices roles structures metrics etc., that enable an enterprise to govern and manage its information and technology activities effectively efficiently reliably securely etc. The compliance regulations are the laws regulations standards guidelines contracts or agreements that govern the information and technology activities of an enterprise. The compliance regulations influence the level of control and assurance that an enterprise needs to demonstrate its adherence to the applicable rules and obligations. By considering the compliance regulations as a governance system component an enterprise can ensure that its governance system is appropriate for itscontext and objectives that it can effectively manage the potential impacts of non-compliance on its reputation performance value stakeholder trust etc., that it can align its information and technology activities with the relevant standards guidelines regulations best practices etc., that it can meet stakeholder requirements expectations etc., 5 References: 5: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: page 47-48 : COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System Components: page 27-28

 The COBIT framework is designed to meet the I&T goals for the entire enterprise. The COBIT framework is a comprehensive governance and management framework for information and technology that helps enterprises to achieve their goals and create value. The COBIT framework consists of four core publications: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology; COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System; COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives; COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution. The COBIT framework is designed to meet the I&T goals for the entire enterprise by providing a holistic approach that covers all aspects of I&T governance and management, as well as by enabling customization and tailoring to suit different contexts, needs, priorities, etc.14 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

 The management objective APO09 Managed Service Agreements involves ensuring that IT services are delivered in accordance with agreed-upon service levels and costs. This management objective covers the activities of defining, negotiating, establishing, monitoring, reporting, and reviewing service agreements between service providers and service consumers. This management objective is most relevant for an enterprise that plans to outsource all of its noncore IT operations but wants to ensure the proper level of governance, risk and compliance (GRC) controls. By applying this management objective, the enterprise can improve its service governance and management capabilities, ensure alignment of IT services with business strategy and objectives, enhance service performance and outcomes, and increase service consumer satisfaction and value realization. This management objective also involves ensuring that the outsourced IT services comply with the applicable laws, regulations, standards, guidelines, contracts, or agreements that govern the information and technology activities of the enterprise, as well as with the enterprise’s policies, procedures, processes, practices, etc. This management objective also involves managing the risks associated with outsourcing IT services such as loss of control, vendor lock-in, quality issues, security breaches, etc.

 Design factors are based on generic components of a governance system but are tailored for a specific purpose or context within a focus area. Design factors are the characteristics or aspects of an enterprise that influence the design and implementation of a governance system. They include factors such as enterprise size, industry sector, risk profile, regulatory environment, sourcing model, etc. Focus areas are topics or issues that can be addressed by governance objectives, such as digital transformation, cybersecurity, privacy, etc. COBIT provides guidance on how to use design factors and focus areas to customize a governance system.13 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution

 The most likely underlying cause for an enterprise not having success implementing IT governance because key staff are not participating in planning meetings is lack of senior leadership commitment. Senior leadership commitment is essential for ensuring that IT governance is aligned with the enterprise’s vision, mission, values, and goals, and that it receives adequate resources, support, and oversight. Without senior leadership commitment, IT governance may face resistance, confusion, or indifference from key stakeholders, resulting in poor implementation outcomes. The cause is based on the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide4, page 25. References: 4: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide | Digital | English

The primary objective of implementing the process of managed innovation is to improve customer experience by identifying and realizing new opportunities for business value creation from information and technology. This process involves scanning the external environment for emerging trends and technologies, engaging with stakeholders to understand their needs and expectations, evaluating and prioritizing innovative ideas, and executing and monitoring innovation initiatives. The process is based on the COBIT 2019 Design Guide1, page 75. References: 1: COBIT 2019 Design Guide | Digital | English

 The Align, Plan and Organize (APO) domain incorporates managed risk as one of its management objectives. The APO domain covers the activities related to aligning IT strategy with business strategy, planning IT resources and capabilities, organizing IT governance structures and processes, managing IT performance, innovation, risk, quality, human resources, security, information, services, etc. The APO domain consists of 13 management objectives that describe the desired outcomes of these activities.14 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives

 Within the COBIT goals cascade, stakeholder drivers are transformed into the enterprise’s actionable strategy. The COBIT goals cascade is a mechanism that helps enterprises to align their governance objectives with their stakeholder needs. It consists of four levels: stakeholder drivers, enterprise goals, alignment goals, and governance and management objectives. Stakeholder drivers are the needs or expectations of the internal or external stakeholders of the enterprise. Enterprise goals are the specific targets or outcomes that the enterprise sets to achieve its vision and mission. Alignment goals are the intermediate goals that link the enterprise goals with the governance and management objectives. Governance and management objectives are the desired outcomes of the governance system for information and technology. Stakeholder drivers are transformed into enterprise goals through a process of analysis, prioritization, and validation. Enterprise goals form the basis ofthe enterprise’s actionable strategy.12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

 An enterprise will often fail to realize implementation commitments during the execution of an EGIT implementation program plan if it focuses on enabling IT value over business value. IT value is the contribution of IT to achieving enterprise objectives, while business value is the overall benefit that the enterprise derives from its use of information and technology. Focusing on IT value over business value may result in a disconnect between IT and business stakeholders, a lack of alignment between IT goals and business strategy, or a failure to deliver expected benefits or outcomes. Therefore, it is important to balance both IT value and business value when implementing a governance system. The answer is based on the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide3, page 38. References: 3: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide | Digital | English

According to the COBIT 2019 Design Guide, before designing an enterprise IT governance system, an organization should first review and understand the enterprise’s strategy. The enterprise’s strategy defines the vision, mission, goals and objectives of the organization, and provides the direction and context for IT governance. The enterprise’s strategy also identifies the key stakeholders, their needs and expectations, and the value proposition of IT to the business.1, p. 16-17 References: 1: COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information and Technology Governance Solution

The benefit derived from the use of COBIT that provides insight on how to derive value from the use of I&T is primarily associated with an internal stakeholder. An internal stakeholder is a person or group within an enterprise that has an interest or concern in its activities or outcomes. Examples of internal stakeholders are board members, executives, managers, employees, etc. An internal stakeholder would benefit from using COBIT by gaining insight on how to derive value from the use of I&T because it would help them to align I&T with business requirements, optimize costs and resources, enhance performance and outcomes, etc.15 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Stakeholder Needs

 The functional task area that is responsible for assessing the potential return on investment (ROI) during future state planning is program management. According to the COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, program management is one of the key enablers of IT governance and management, and it includes the processes and practices for planning, executing, monitoring, controlling, and closing IT programs and projects. One of the activities of program management is to conduct a business case analysis for each proposed improvement initiative in the future state plan. This analysis involves estimating the costs, benefits, risks, dependencies, assumptions, constraints, success factors, and ROI of each initiative. The analysis helps to prioritize and justify the initiatives based on their expected value to the enterprise. References: : COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution, page 15 1 : COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide: Implementing and Optimizing an Information and Technology Governance Solution, page 38 

 The most critical factor to ensuring the objective of managed availability and capacity is to predict future IT resource requirements based on current and projected business needs, service levels, and performance targets. This factor enables the enterprise to plan, provision, and optimize IT resources in a timely and cost-effective manner, while ensuring that IT services are delivered with sufficient availability and capacity to meet business demands. The factor is based on the COBIT 2019 Design Guide2, page 77. References: 2: COBIT 2019 Design Guide | Digital | English

 The Build, Acquire and Implement (BAI) domain deals with the definition of IT solutions and their integration in business processes. This domain covers the activities related to identifying, developing, acquiring, implementing, testing, integrating, and deploying IT solutions that meet business requirements. The BAI domain consists of 10 management objectives that describe the desired outcomes of these activities.14 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives

The enterprise goal of compliance with external laws and regulations is aligned to the financial dimension of the balanced scorecard (BSC). The BSC is a strategic performance management tool that helps enterprises to translate their vision and strategy into operational objectives and measures. The BSC consists of four dimensions: financial, customer, internal, and growth. The financial dimension focuses on the financial performance and value creation of the enterprise. Compliance with external laws and regulations is one of the 17 generic enterprise goals defined by COBIT that supports the financial dimension.12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives

A key principle of an enterprise governance system is that it should focus on all technology and information processing, regardless of where processing takes place. This means that the governance system should cover not only the IT function, but also the business processes, functions, and units that use or rely on I&T. It also means that the governance system should address the external entities that provide or consume I&T services or data, such as customers, suppliers, partners, regulators, etc. COBIT adopts a holistic view of enterprise I&T that encompasses all internal and external stakeholders.14 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

The business case outline is a document that provides a high-level overview of the rationale, objectives, scope, approach, benefits, costs, risks, and timeline of the EGIT implementation program. The EGIT implementation program is a program that involves designing and implementing a governance system for an enterprise using COBIT 2019. The business case outline provides the basis for obtaining approval in principle from the stakeholders for initiating the EGIT implementation program. The business case outline is a key input to be considered when defining drivers for a COBIT implementation. The drivers are the internal and external factors that trigger or influence the need for designing and implementing a governance system for an enterprise using COBIT 2019. The drivers include aspects such as business strategy objectives performance risks issues opportunities etc., information and technology strategy objectives performance risks issues opportunities etc., stakeholder needs expectations requirements etc., standards guidelines regulations best practices etc., market conditions competitive pressures customer demands etc., etc. By considering the business case outline when defining drivers for a COBIT implementation an enterprise can ensure that it has a clear understanding of why it needs to design and implement a governance system using COBIT 2019 what are the expected outcomes benefits value etc.,

 The primary reason for management to conduct a process capability assessment is to better understand the current state as compared to the target state. A process capability assessment is a method of measuring and evaluating how well a process or activity is performed in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, completeness, reliability, etc. A process capability assessment can be done using different models or frameworks, such as CMMI or ISO/IEC 15504. A process capability assessment helps management to better understand the current state of a process by identifying its strengths, weaknesses, gaps, and improvement opportunities. A process capability assessment also helps management to compare the current state with the target state, which is the desired level of performance or outcome for a process.13 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT Process Assessment Model (PAM): Using COBIT 5

The role of IT design factor describes how IT supports the enterprise strategy and objectives. Turnaround is a role of IT that is viewed as a driver for business process and service innovation, by enabling new ways of doing business, creating new sources of revenue, and enhancing customer satisfaction1, p. 29. References: 1: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology

The value that I&T delivers should be aligned directly with the values on which the business is focused. This is based on the principle of alignment, which states that “governance of enterprise I&T should ensure that I&T-enabled investments are aligned with the enterprise strategy and deliver the expected benefits” . Value delivery is not only about maintaining or increasing value from existing I&T investments, but also about ensuring that new investments support the strategic objectives and stakeholder needs of the enterprise.

 The number of confidentiality incidents causing financial loss, business disruption or public embarrassment would be the best metric to enable an enterprise to evaluate an alignment goal specifically related to security of information and privacy. A metric is a quantifiable measure that is used to track and assess the status of a specific process or activity. An alignment goal is an intermediate goal that links the enterprise goals with the governance and management objectives. Security of information and privacy is one of the 17 generic alignment goals defined by COBIT that describes how information and technology can support the protection of sensitive information and personal data. The number of confidentiality incidents causing financial loss, business disruption or public embarrassment is a metric that reflects how well this alignment goal is achieved.12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

The business case and program plan are essential documents that describe the rationale, objectives, scope, approach, benefits, costs, risks, and timeline of the EGIT implementation program. The business case and program plan provide the basis for obtaining approval, funding, resources, and support for the program from the stakeholders. Therefore, it is important that these documents are realistic and achievable, reflecting the current state and target state of information and technology governance in the enterprise. One of the roles that ensures the business case and program plan are realistic and achievable is the chief information officer (CIO), who is the senior executive responsible for leading and managing the information and technology function in the enterprise. The CIO has a role in developing, reviewing, validating, and approving the business case and program plan, ensuring that they are aligned with the enterprise’s strategy, objectives, needs, and expectations. The CIO also has a role in communicating and presenting the business case and program plan to other stakeholders such as the board, executives, business managers, IT managers, etc., and obtaining their buy-in and commitment for the program34 References: 3: COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, page 39-40 4: COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, page 20-21

The level achieved when all processes of a focus area achieve a particular capability level is referred to as the maturity level. A focus area is a topic or issue that can be addressed by governance objectives, such as digital transformation, cybersecurity, privacy, etc. A focus area consists of a set of processes that are relevant and applicable for the topic or issue. A capability level is a measure of how well a process or activity is performed in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, completeness, reliability, etc. A capability level can range from 0 (incomplete) to 5 (optimizing). A maturity level is the level achieved when all processes of a focus area achieve a particular capability level. A maturity level can range from 0 (non-existent) to 5 (optimized).12 References: COBIT 2019 Framework: Introduction and Methodology, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance System

Using the COBIT 2019 Governance System Design Workflow allows enterprises to realize a governance system that is tailored to their needs. The COBIT 2019 Governance System Design Workflow is a set of steps that guide enterprises in designing a customized governance system based on their specific context, goals, issues, and priorities. The workflow helps enterprises to identify their current state, desired state, gaps, improvement opportunities, design factors, governance components, roles, responsibilities, practices, activities, inputs, outputs, goals, metrics, and road map for implementing their governance system. The workflow also helps enterprises to balance competing requirements and resolve conflicts among stakeholders. By following the workflow, enterprises can design a governance system that fits their unique needs and delivers value to their business. References: : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 29 2 : COBIT 2019 Design Guide: Designing an Information & Technology Governance Solution, page 31