CIPS L4M5 Commercial Negotiation Exam Practice Test

Commercial negotiation objectives should be driven by the business needs of the organisation. Organisations are made up of different stakeholder groups, some of whom may have different, even conflicting objectives. From a negotiation perspective, stakeholders can be defined as persons or groups that have interest (or stake) in the outcome of the negotiation you are leading or participating in.

CIPS distinguishes between 3 sets of stakeholders:

- Internal stakeholders

- Connected stakeholders

- External stakeholders

End-users are examples of internal stakeholders. They are the people who will benefit from the purchase of a product or service. However, their interest may conflict with other groups, i.e. thebudget controllers whose objective is minimising the expense. In negotiation perspective, procurement should involve different groups of stakeholder.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Commercial negotiations involve a wider set of stakeholders than procurement, budget holders, and users. Depending on context, directors, IT specialists, legal teams, regulators, or external partners may all be impacted. Ignoring them risks resistance or missed requirements. CIPS stresses stakeholder mapping tools (such as Mendelow’s Matrix) to identify influence and interest levels, ensuring all relevant parties are managed appropriately in negotiation preparation and execution. Narrow stakeholder identification can undermine outcomes.

Distributive negotiation carries several risks beyond justlosing out on value. These includedamaging supplier relationships,eroding trust, andreaching an impasse, where neither party can agree. This could result in delayed projects, increased costs, or supplier withdrawal.

“Distributive negotiation can lead to a breakdown in communication, impasses, and long-term relationship damage. The win-lose mindset can prevent collaborative problem-solving.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.5 - Risks of Distributive Approaches)

Currency exchange rates are determined by macroeconomic factors and demand and supply. In general, countries with stable political and economic systems, a growing economy and a strong rule of law will have stronger and more stable currency than those without these characteristics. In this question, the British Pound is stronger than other currency, which means that buyers who import goods from the UK have to pay higher in their own currencies.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA) is the plan B or back-up plan in the event of a ‘walk away’. In case of no deal, buyer (or supplier) may switch to this option.

The zone of potential agreement (ZOPA) is considered an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground. It is this area where parties will often compromise and strike a deal. In order for negotiating parties to find a settlement or reach an agreement, they must work towards a common goal and seek an area that incorporates at least some of each party's ideas.

STEEPLE offers an overview of various external fields. It is an acronym for Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal and Ethical.

PESTLE is a mnemonic which in its expanded form denotes P for Political, E for Economic, S for Social, T for Technological, L for Legal and E for Environmental. It gives a bird’s eye view of the whole environment from many different angles that one wants to check and keep a track of while contemplating on a certain idea/plan.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Direct costs are expenses that can be clearly attributed to the production of specific goods. These typically include raw materials, direct labor, and other costs tied directly to the manufacturing process. They are variable with production volume and help procurement teams analyze pricing more effectively during negotiations.

Direct costs are those directly attributable to the production of a unit — such as raw materials, components, and direct labour. Here, the metal used is a clear direct cost, as it varies with production output. Rent, insurance, and sales wages are indirect (overhead) costs, which must be allocated across products. Understanding this distinction is vital in negotiations, since direct costs are easier to challenge for efficiency gains, while indirect allocations may be arbitrary. Buyers with clear knowledge of cost breakdowns can negotiate more effectively, avoiding inflated pricing.

In some markets, suppliers experience peaks and troughs in demand and so buyers can increase their leverage through developing an understanding of how busy their vendor are at particular time during the year or business cycle and targetting at quieter period. Similarly, if a buyer can develop an understanding of supplier capacity and to what extent have they covered their fixed cost, they may be able to target suppliers when their average costs are likely to be lowest. Vendor's average costs will be higher at low and high capacity utilisation.

A picture containing graphical user interface Description automatically generated

Using logic involves applying numerical data and factual evidence to support arguments in a negotiation. Logical reasoning appeals to objective analysis rather than emotional or coercive tactics and is effective in convincing the other party through structured, fact-based arguments, aligning with CIPS's guidance on logical negotiation techniques.

Integrative negotiation relies on openness and trust, aiming to identify underlying interests, not just positions. Withholding information is typical of distributive (win-lose) bargaining, where each side protects its bottom line. In an integrative context, hiding key details prevents mutual understanding, reduces creative option-building, and damages relationship trust. Instead, transparency enables value creation—such as joint cost reduction or innovation. CIPS emphasises that power must be balanced with openness when integrative outcomes are desired.

Integrative negotiation focuses on collaboration, transparency, and the pursuit of shared benefits. It emphasizes mutual problem-solving and long-term value creation rather than short-term wins.

Skilled negotiators seek to understand the needs of the other parties, as well as their own. In doing so, it allows them to determine a strategy that their own needs are met. Failing tounderstand the other party's needs is one of the most common reason for an unsuccessful negotiation. In the commercial negotiation, procurement team does not negotiate with organisation, they negotiate with individuals. It is therefore important to recognise that there are two levels of needs:

The organisation - What the organisation wants to achieve. This is generally well stated and understood

The individual - what is in it for the individual? This is generally not stated, rarely discussed, but very motivational. It is vitally important therefore that time is invested in understanding the needs of the individual

Skilled negotiators are aware of the needs that occur at both levels, and develop creative options and strategies that attempt to satisfy these needs.

The zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) or bargaining range is considered an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground. It is this area where parties will often compromise and strike a deal. In order for negotiating parties to find a settlement or reach an agreement, they must work towards a common goal and seek an area that incorporates at least some of each party's ideas.

The zone of proximal development refers to the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can achieve with guidance and encouragement from a skilled partner.

There is no Walk away area. Walk away point is a position from which you cannot concede any more ground and must walk away/decline a deal.

Best alternative to a negotiated agreement is a fallback or backstop position if the negotiation fails to result in an agreement/no deal is agreed.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Mark-up is defined as profit expressed as a percentage of the cost. It calculates the profit margin based on the cost price rather than the selling price, which allows companies to determine how much they are earning over their production or purchase costs. This aligns with standard accounting and CIPS definitions of mark-up in procurement contexts.

Elasticity refers to the responsiveness of quantity demanded or quantity supplied to a change in price or another factor.

In microeconomic graphs, elasticity and inelasticity can be shown by the slope of the demand curve. If a demand curve is almost horizontal, then the product pricing can be described as very elastic. If a demand curve is almost vertical, then the product pricing can be described as very inelastic.

The formulae of elasticity:

Text Description automatically generated with low confidence

Table Description automatically generated with medium confidence

LO 2, AC 2.2

Junior team members can play supportive roles in negotiations, such as taking notes and observing the proceedings. These roles allow them to learn and contribute without leading the negotiation. Serving as an expert or chair would typically require more experience and authority.

Closed questions (requiring yes/no or factual answers) are best for verifying facts, ensuring clarity and accuracy. Open questions are useful for exploration, while hypothetical test possibilities, and leading steer responses. In negotiation, closed questions confirm details such as prices, quantities, or deadlines, preventing ambiguity in agreements. CIPS stresses using the full range of question types strategically, with closed questions essential in finalising commitments.

Conflicts arise in procurement when risks, costs, or gains are not fairly shared, creating perceptions of exploitation. Another frequent source is late payment of supplier invoices, which damages trust and supplier cash flow. Scheduling or early involvement, by contrast, usually supports collaboration unless poorly managed. Conflict is natural in negotiations due to divergent interests, but recognising sources allows proactive management. Skilled negotiators use integrative approaches to turn potential conflict into opportunity, aligning incentives and ensuring fairness.

Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative. When avoiding, an individual does not immediately pursue his or her own concerns or those of the other person. He or she does not address the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping an issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation.

LO 1, AC 1.1

The supplier is using Rational persuasion by providing logical reasons, such as economic conditions and increased costs, to justify the price increase. This approach uses factual information to influence the buyer's decision, aiming to present the price hike as a reasonable adjustment, which aligns with CIPS strategies on influencing tactics in negotiations.

Trust is the expectation that the other party will behave in a predictable and mutually acceptable way. In inter-firm relationships, the presence and absence of trust can affect the level of cost in a relationship. The existence of trust is taught to lower the transaction cost in a relationship. Dr. Mari Sako identified taxonomy of 3 types of trust in commercial relationship, which is very useful from the perspective of procurement.

Contractual trust: Trust based on the contract with TOP. This is potentially the weakest source of trust if there is nothing else to base the trust on, but it is the quickest to establish.

Competence trust: Trust based on TOP's professional qualifications or proven or certified technical capability or experience.

Goodwill trust: Trust based on knowing TOP has your interest at heart and will not behave opportunistically. This is potentially the strongest type of trust, but it takes the longest time to build.

Late paymentsdamage trust and strain supplier cash flow, becoming a direct source of conflict. Similarly, when gains, risks, or costs arenot equitably shared, perceptions of unfairness can destabilize the relationship.

“Persistent late payments not only threaten supplier cash flows but can significantly erode trust. Additionally, disproportionate sharing of risks or benefits can create resentment and hinder collaboration.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.3 - Causes and Management of Conflict in Procurement)

The earlier procurement get involved in the procurement processes, the better. If procurement are involved in design at the specification stage they can feed in prices and costs to designer so they know the likely budget implication of choices made. Sending in a procurement team to negotiate at or close to the end of the procurement process effectively ties their hands and limits their negotiation leverage. This is illustrated in the graph below:

Chart Description automatically generated

LO 2, AC 2.1

A perfectly competitive market is one with the following features:

- There are many firms producing identical or very similar (homogeneous) goods or services

- There are no barriers to entry to the market or exit from the market - anyone can enter or leave easily

- Both producers and customers have perfect knowledge of the market place, prices, costs of production and influences on demand and supply

Under these conditions, the price and quantity will always tend toward equilibrium as any producer that sets a price above equilibrium will not sell anything at all, and any producer that sets a price below a equilibrium will obtain 100% market share in theory. The demand curve is perfectly elastic, which means that it will be horizontal. In a perfectly competitive market, it is difficult to increase profits through pricing, and suppliers instead must focus on their cost structure. As these conditions imply, there are few if any examples of perfectly competitive market.

LO 2, AC 2.2

In difficult negotiations and disputes, hardball tactics like punishment and threats often seem like the only way to win concessions. Some negotiators seem to believe that hardball tactics are the key to success in any negotiation. They resort to extreme demands and even unethical behaviour to try to get the upper hand in a negotiation.

The following are 8 typical hardball tactics:

1. Good cop / Bad cop

2. Low ball / High ball

3. Bogey

4. The Nibble

5. Chicken

6. Intimidation

7. Aggressive Behaviour

8. Snow Job

You can read the details of each tactic here.

In the contrary to hardball tactics, negotiators can adopt integrative approach to the negotiation. Some of integrative tactics are:

1. Expand the Pie

2. Bridging

3. Post Settlement –Settlement

Et cetera

Essential goods and services such as electricity, fuel, basic food stuffs, commuter transport and habitual products such as tobacco, alcohol and sugar-based drinks are often sited as facing a relatively inelastic demand curve. This means when the price goes up, the quantity demanded does not decrease very much and so they are often the target of government taxation.

LO2, AC 2.2

In a globalised commercial world characterised by dynamic market and multiple companies competing for business, a positive corporate reputation can be an enormous asset. Reputational strength in one organisation might be based on some or all of the following characteristics:

- Quality of products or services

- Low cost/high value for money

- High ethical standards

- Reliability

- Cutting-edge technology

- Strong customer focus

- Engineering excellence

LO 1, AC 1.4

Effective listeners demonstrate empathy and use paraphrasing to confirm understanding. These skills help build rapport, validate the speaker, and ensure accurate interpretation. Persuading and immediate solutions are active interventions, not listening behaviours. CIPS emphasises active listening as central to persuasion and relationship building in negotiation, enabling buyers to uncover underlying interests and respond appropriately.

Sally's objective is to achieve a 5% saving. If the supplier offers this saving in a different form (aftercare package), and the total value meets her goal, then accepting this alternative shows flexibility and supports a collaborative,win-winoutcome.

Professional buyers, when planning or engaging in negotiation with suppliers, should always be aware of where the intended and actual relationship with this supplier is positioned on the 'spectrum' or 'continuum' of commercial relationships. The relationship spectrum describes the range of commercial relationships between a buyer and supplier based on richness of communication, longevity and mutual dependence.

Timeline Description automatically generated

In the question, the contract is simple one-off (or spot buy), which means the relationship will likely to be more transactional. In such relationship, price is the most important criteria and buyer may adopt arm's-length approach.

A monopoly occurs when a single supplier dominates a market, giving them high bargaining power over buyers. By contrast, monopsony is where a single buyer dominates, oligopoly involves a few large suppliers, and monopolistic competition refers to many suppliers with differentiated products. Monopoly power in negotiations means buyers have reduced leverage and may need to rely on regulatory frameworks or collaborative strategies to balance outcomes.

Whenmany supplierscompete forfew buyers, buyers gain leverage. This competition can drive prices down and increase the buyer’s ability to negotiate favorable terms. Conversely, if the buyer is dependent on a supplier (as in A), the buyer’s power diminishes.

“Buyer power increases when there are many suppliers and few buyers. The buyer has multiple options and can negotiate from a position of strength.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.3 - Relative Bargaining Power and Market Dynamics)

The Win-Win approach is the most appropriate negotiation strategy in situations where collaboration and ongoing relationships are prioritized. In this case:

Achieving cost savings: The NHS aims to reduce expenses in order to reallocate funds to critical areas, making it essential that both parties work together to find cost-effective solutions.

Collaborative supplier relationship: Since Maria is working with a collaborative supplier, maintaining a positive relationship through mutual benefit is essential for continued cooperation.

Alignment with public service objectives: A Win-Win outcome aligns with the NHS's broader objectives of maximizing resources for patient care, as it ensures that savings are achieved without undermining the supplier’s commitment to quality service.

This approach aligns with CIPS guidelines for maintaining productive, ethical partnerships in procurement, especially in critical sectors like healthcare.

Persistent late payment of the supplier’s invoices (A) and Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs with the supplier (B) are potential sources of conflict as they create dissatisfaction and imbalance in the relationship. According to CIPS materials:

Late payments (A) can strain the supplier’s cash flow, affecting their operational stability and leading to mistrust in the buyer.

Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs (B) can result in one party feeling exploited or unfairly treated, which undermines the collaborative spirit essential for long-term partnerships.

In contrast, requesting early supplier involvement, planning visits, or setting delivery dates are typically part of constructive relationship management practices and do not inherently lead to conflict.

In the scenario, the value of contract as well as the importance of purchased item justify the procurement's travel. Visiting a supplier at their HQ or operational facility may facilitate the procurement team in assessing, albeit briefly, the culture of the organisation, how busy they seem and how staff engage with each other. A visit is a good opportunity to assess supplier's capacity.

LO 2, AC 2.2

In the planning and preparation stage of negotiation, it is essential to build a strong foundation by understanding various factors that influence the negotiation outcome. According to CIPS resources, critical aspects of preparation include:

Understanding the other party (A): This helps in anticipating their needs, objectives, and potential negotiation styles, leading to more strategic discussions.

Defining the constituents (B): This involves identifying all stakeholders or parties impacted by the negotiation, ensuring their interests are considered when planning the negotiation strategy.

Analyzing the bargaining power (F): Understanding the relative power each party brings to the negotiation helps in setting realistic goals and predicting possible negotiation dynamics.

These elements are foundational in ensuring a well-rounded approach and enabling both parties to enter negotiations with clarity and strategy, enhancing the potential for a positive outcome.

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Win-lose approach is useful when the relationship with the other party (TOP) is short-term and once-off.

The question mentions 4 types of relationship:

Adversarial: Both seek to maximize position at the expense of the other. Almost no trust, communication and cooperation. These suppliers will probably provide non-core products or services with the buyer purchasing them on a one-off basis.

Outsourcing relationship: Use competent suppliers to manage non-core businesses previously done in-house. Require high level of trust and collaboration

Partnership: Both work closely on long term development by sharing information, technology and ideas.High level of trust with the aim to benefit both parties (win-win)

Strategic alliance: Both parties identify areas where they could collaborate to create mutual benefits

Among these 4 types of relationship, only adversarial is once-off. Then it is the correct answer.

It has been said that most negotiations are won (or lost) at the preparation stage. Success in a negotiation cannot be claimed unless you can refer back to your objectives and show how you have achieve them. In broad terms, negotiation plans/strategies involve 4 key activities:

1. Developing and prioritising your objectives and limits

2. Seeking to understand TOP's objectives

3. Developing concession plans

4. Planning the resources and logistics required and agreeing team roles.

Questions to gain an understanding of why a negotiation failed

Did we collect and make effective use of all information available when preparing for the negotiation?

Did we set objectives for the negotiation that were stretching and achievable and established MIL objectives?

Did we determine a strategy for the negotiation?

Did the other party understand our needs correctly?

Were we aware of the underlying interests of the other party?

Were our proposals convincing enough for acceptance by the other party?

Did we explore different variables in the negotiation?

Did we fully understand all proposals?

Did we give any unplanned concessions and did we check the importance of these?

Did we focus on common interests?

Did we ask a range of questions?

Did we get answers to all our questions?

Could we answer all the questions addressed to us in a proper and positive way?

Did we summarise effectively?

Did we use different methods of persuasion in the negotiations?

Which tactics did we use and what effect did they have?

Did our negotiating team work well as a team?

Did we help to create a co-operative atmosphere

By removing the requirement for named personnel, CDL could allow the supplier flexibility in allocating equally competent but possibly less expensive staff. This tradeable does not compromise on quality but helps control costs.

To improve negotiation outcomes, seeking feedback from the supplier (1) and undertaking reflective practice (4) are recommended actions. Feedback from the supplier can provide insights into areas for improvement from the counterparty's perspective, while reflective practice allows the negotiator to evaluate their own approach, outcomes, and areas for growth. This approach aligns with CIPS's emphasis on continuous improvement in negotiation skills.

Coercive powerstems from the ability to apply pressure or sanctions, whilereferent powercomes from reputation, charisma, or respect. These are both recognised power sources in negotiations. “Intruded” and “tactical” power are not classified within the standard power framework used in CIPS materials.

“Sources of power include coercive (based on threats or penalties), referent (based on personal appeal or influence), and others such as reward, expert, and legitimate power.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.1 - Power in Negotiation)

A probing question seeks deeper information, clarifying specifics beyond surface-level responses. Lina’s question is factual, detailed, and investigative — designed to uncover processes and commitments. Hypothetical questions test options (“what if…”), reflective restate or summarise to confirm understanding, and leading steer the respondent toward a desired answer. Probing is essential in negotiations to validate claims, identify risks, and build persuasive arguments.

Integrative negotiation is a negotiation strategy in which the involved parties work together to find a solution that satisfies the needs and concerns of each. This process often involves group brainstorming and creative thinking for individuals to suggest different ideas that benefit both parties.

Compromising is often common in integrative negotiation, and both sides may need to give up certain needs to reach a solution. Honesty can also promote successful integrative negotiation because it can lead to a comprehensive understanding of the issue and what each party needs to be satisfied with the result.

An adversarial style is appropriate when issues are non-negotiable, such as health and safety commitments (D). In these scenarios, compliance is required without compromise, and a firm stance may be necessary. This aligns with CIPS guidance, where adversarial tactics are used in non-negotiable contexts to enforce strict standards.

CIPS stresses that clear verbal confirmation is required for agreements. Non-verbal signals (smiles, nods, handshakes) can indicate politeness or ambiguity but do not constitute binding agreement. Assuming agreement risks later disputes or misunderstandings. Skilled negotiators ensure closure by explicitly summarising agreed terms and documenting them. Non-verbal communication is supportive, not decisive, in contract negotiation contexts.

Under the European Union public procurement directives, all public sector bodies must abide by certain rules when they procure goods and services over a threshold value. These rules are codified under 5 procurement procedures:

1. Open Procedure

2. Restricted Procedure

3. Competitive Dialogue

4. Competitive Procedure with Negotiation

5. Innovation Partnerships.

Under normal circumstances, there is no commercial negotiation allowed under the two most commonly used procedure, Open and Restricted. Under these procedures, the prices and terms and conditions of contract should be decided via reference only to the tenderers' responses to the buyer's requests for tenders, and not through 'post-tender negotiation'. Under the other procedure, negotiation within the rules is permitted. Interested learners can read more about these procedures here.

LO 1, AC 1.1

In the scenario, to exchange cost cutting, the purchasing manager promises to 'reward' supplier shorter payment period. This is an example of reward power, which results from one person's ability to

compensate or reward another for compliance.

The reward does not need to be money, but could be introduction to other buyers in the group, positive references, agreement to trial new product, quicker payment or indeed any other variable that the buyer

knows is attractive and valued by the supplier.

Buyer power gives customers/consumers (buyers) the ability to squeeze industry margins by pressuring firms (the suppliers) to reduce prices or increase the quality of services or products offered.

There are four major factors to consider when determining the bargaining power of buyers:

1. Number of buyers relative to suppliers: If the number of buyers is small relative to that of suppliers, the buyer’s power will be stronger.

2. Dependence of a buyer’s purchase on a particular supplier: If a buyer is able to get similar products/services from other suppliers, buyers depend less on a particular supplier. Therefore, the power of the buyer would be greater.

3. Switching costs: If there are not many alternative suppliers available, the cost of switching is high. Therefore, buyer power would be low.

4. Backward Integration: If the buyer is able to integrate or merge suppliers, the buyer has greater bargaining power over the existing suppliers.

When is Bargaining Power of Buyers High/Strong?

There are fewer buyers relative to that of suppliers

The switching costs of the buyer are low

If the buyer is able to backward integrate

The buyer purchases product in bulk (high volume)

The buyer is able to get similar product/services from other suppliers

The buyer purchases the majority of the seller’s products

Several substitutes are available on the market

Product is not differentiated

According toMendelow’s Matrix, stakeholders withhigh interest but low powershould be keptinformed. Their interest means they care about the negotiation's outcome, but their low power means they can't significantly influence it. Keeping them informed avoids alienation and ensures smoother implementation of negotiated agreements.

“Stakeholders with high interest but low power should be managed by keeping them informed. They may become powerful advocates or opponents in the future, so engaging them is a strategic approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.5 - Stakeholder Management in Commercial Negotiations)

The formal negotiation process includes planning and preparation (objectives, BATNA, MIL) and testing/proposing (exchanging offers). Hospitality is not a stage—it may support relationships but is not part of structured negotiation. Arguing/persuasion occurs within bargaining but is not defined as a stage in itself. Understanding the stages ensures structured progress and prevents disorganised discussions, which often result in suboptimal agreements.

Hammad’s approach of presenting facts, figures, and justifications aligns with the Push persuasion method. The Push strategy involves directly presenting information, data, and logical arguments to convince the other party of a certain outcome. In this scenario, Hammad is using objective evidence to influence the supplier towards agreeing to a discount, which is characteristic of the Push method, as per CIPS guidance on negotiation tactics.

The objective of the buyer here is to improve supplier cost structures over time, which requires them to have insight into supplier's current cost information. Purchase price cost analysis (PPCA) can help here. PPCA is a method for gathering, analysing and using price and cost information in a systematic way. The process allows the identification of future savings and opportunities to improve current costs.

STEEPLE analysis is used to analyse the macro environment that may have impact on an organisation.

Competitive rivalry is a part of Porter's Five Forces which is a tool for strategy making.

Volume concentration is a way to increase the purchasing quantities in order for a buying organisation to improve its leverage in negotiation.

At the first stage of CIPS Procurement and Supply Cycle (Understand need and develop a high-level specification), procurement professional mainly negotiate with internal stakeholders. They have a duty to proportionately and constructively challenge specification if there's genuine doubt over the need or how the need is expressed. This is called demand management. Their first duty is to the organisation's treasury, not to functional managers.

Demand management including: negotiation/challenge between procurement and internal stakeholders over the need/requirement/specification. Remember that in any process or product, the greatest opportunity for cost reduction is at the design stage.

Variable costsare expenses that change in proportion to business activity or production volume.Raw materialsanddelivery costsdirectly increase as more products are produced. In contrast,rentandinsuranceare fixed costs that remain constant regardless of output levels.

“Variable costs are directly linked to production output. Raw materials and logistics (e.g., delivery) scale with order volume, impacting supplier pricing and buyer negotiations.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Direct and Variable Cost Classifications)

The coercive power comes from the belief that a person can punish others for non-compliance. It can be considered as opposite to reward power, which results from one person's ability to compensate or reward another for compliance.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Mendelow’s Matrix categorises stakeholders by power and interest. High-interest, low-power stakeholders must be kept informed, as they care about outcomes but lack direct influence. Keeping them informed builds trust and reduces resistance. By contrast, high power/interest stakeholders are key players, while low power/low interest require minimal effort. This tool ensures negotiation strategies align with stakeholder dynamics, preventing overlooked risks or conflicts.

Fixed-price agreements give buyers financial certainty, reducing exposure to supplier inefficiencies, cost increases, or inflation. The supplier bears the risk of cost overruns. While it doesn’t automatically improve quality or payment terms, it allows buyers to forecast budgets and manage risk effectively. This makes fixed-price contracts especially useful for projects with defined scopes, where costs are predictable. In contrast, cost-plus contracts keep the risk with the buyer and require constant monitoring of supplier costs, making them less attractive in terms of risk management.

Consultation involves actively involving stakeholders or counterparties in decision-making. By seeking input, it fosters a sense of ownership, increasing commitment to negotiated outcomes. It is particularly effective when the negotiator has low positional power, as it shifts dynamics from authority to collaboration. Unlike coercion or compliance tactics, consultation builds engagement and long-term trust, which is critical in complex procurement where buy-in is essential for contract success. CIPS stresses its role in building influence where direct authority is limited.

A business negotiation agenda is a formal agreed upon list of goals to be achieved or items to be discussed in a particular order during a meeting or negotiation. Agendas can be formal and obvious, or informal and subtle in negotiations.

The agenda is one of the main structural elements of negotiation, in addition to such questions as site, identification of participants, and elements of timing. Together, they answer the who, what, when, and where questions. As with other aspects of negotiation, the agenda can be used either manipulatively to enhance leverage or to improve the prospects for agreement and the possibilities for mutual gain. In most cases, it will be used both ways, reflecting the nature of negotiation as a “mixed-motive” situation.

Although it can be instrumental to [research] volunteer as a sole source to write the agenda, in most cases it becomes a joint activity to construct a consensual basis for subsequent negotiation. In these situations, agenda-building becomes one of the pre-negotiation activities that set the tone for the relationship (Saunders, 1985). In other situations, the parties may engage in actual negotiation without a formal or written agenda. When this occurs, the risks and uncertainties may be high but the party who appreciates the importance of the informal agenda has a tremendous advantage.

Whether one plans it or not, during the course of negotiation the parties will discuss a finite set of issues in some sequence and from a particular perceptual framework. Consciousness of the universality and centrality of the agenda is prerequisite to guiding negotiation to a successful conclusion.

Activity-based costing is an alternative approach to traditional absorption costing. The characteristics of these two methods are illustrated in the graph below:

Graphical user interface, text, chat or text message, website Description automatically generated

A monopoly exists when only one company can supply an essential product or service in a given region because of significant barriers to entry for any competitor. The barriers can be legal, regulatory, economic, or geographic. Ma Bell case is an example of monopoly. The company was broken up in 1982.

A monopsony is a market structure in which a single buyer substantially controls the market as the major purchaser of goods and services offered by many would-be sellers.

Pure or perfect competition is a theoretical market structure in which the following criteria are met:

- All firms sell an identical product (the product is a "commodity" or "homogeneous").

- All firms are price takers (they cannot influence the market price of their product).

- Market share has no influence on prices.

- Buyers have complete or "perfect" information—in the past, present and future—about the product being sold and the prices charged by each firm.

- Resources for such a labor are perfectly mobile.

- Firms can enter or exit the market without cost.

Monopolistic competition characterizes an industry in which many firms offer products or services that are similar, but not perfect substitutes. Barriers to entry and exit in a monopolistic competitive industry are low, and the decisions of any one firm do not directly affect those of its competitors. Monopolistic competition is closely related to the business strategy of brand differentiation

Trust may create value as following:

LO 1, AC 1.4

Monopolies exist in many markets in real life for very different reasons:

Ownership of a Key Resource: When one company exerts sole control over a resource that is necessary for the production of a specific product, the market may become a monopoly. For example, the only medication deemed acceptable to treat a disease comes from a particular ingredient X, and knowledge of this ingredient X is owned by a single family owned company. The company can, therefore, be said to have a monopoly over ingredient X that is needed to cure the disease because it is the only company that can produce a product deemed acceptable.

Government Franchise: In certain instances, a monopoly may be explicitly created by the government if it grants a single company, whether private or government-owned, the right to conduct business in a particular market. For example, when a national railways transportation service is created by the government, in most cases they are granted a monopoly on the operation of passenger trains in the country. As a result, other firms are only able to offer passenger train services with the cooperation and/or permission of the government-owned provider.

Intellectual Property Protection: Extending intellectual property protection to a company in the form of patents and copyrights is yet another way in which monopolies are created. When a government does this, it is in fact giving a single company an exclusive right to provide a particular product / service to the market. Patents and copyrights work in providing owners of intellectual property with the right to act as an exclusive provider of a new product for a specific length of time. This creates a temporary monopoly in the market with regards to new products and services.

Natural Monopoly: A market may also become a monopoly simply because it may be more cost-effective for one company to serve the whole market than to have several smaller firms in competition with one another. A company with virtually unlimited economies of scale is referred to as a natural monopoly. Such firms become monopolies due to their position and size, which makes it impossible for new entrants in the market to compete price-wise. Natural monopolies are common in industries with high fixed costs and low marginal costs of operation such as providers of television, telephone, and internet services.

In this question, 'A single firm is very large' is not enough to tell whether this market is monopolistic.

Suppliers’ pricing decisions are influenced by both internal and external factors. Internal include cost of production, overheads, and lifecycle stage. External include competition (market dynamics, alternatives available) and customer perception of value (willingness to pay, brand image). These external elements are beyond supplier control but crucial in determining market price levels. Recognising these allows buyers to assess supplier pricing flexibility and to negotiate based on market realities rather than supplier cost claims.

Variable pricing can lead to budgeting challenges and financial uncertainty over a 12-month period. While variable pricing may allow flexibility, it complicates financial planning and forecasting. For predictable budgeting and reduced financial risk, fixed pricing is typicallypreferred in such contract durations, aligning with CIPS recommendations on pricing models in contract management.

The agreement and closing phase is the phase when it is either clear through explicit language, or strongly suggested through non-verbal signals, that TOP is ready to move to agreement. Judging when to close can be difficult and as with phases of the negotiation, experience, observation, practice and reflection will be the best ways to learn here.

In the closing phase, procurement should:

- Watch for closing/buying signals

- Check to ensure all issues have been resolved

- Consider using visual aids to summarise

- Use 'summary close'

- Make a decision to conclude/close

- Seek agreement in principle if TOP does not have the final authority

- Make your own private notes on the final agreement

- Shake hands on the agreement

- Leave the meeting as soon as possible thereafter.

LO 3, AC 3.1

Acollaborative win-win approachfocuses on mutual benefit and long-term value creation. This strategy is especially effective in strategic partnerships where trust, information sharing, and problem-solving are emphasized over competition.

“The collaborative win-win approach aims to create outcomes where both parties gain. This strengthens the relationship and leads to sustainable agreements built on trust and transparency.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Win-Win Negotiation Strategy)

Nonverbal communication is important because it gives us valuable information about a situation including how a person might be feeling, how someone receives information and how to approach a person or group of people.

There are several types of nonverbal communications you should be aware of, including:

1. Body language

Body language is the way someone situates their body naturally depending on the situation, the environment and how they are feeling.

Example: Someone might cross their arms if they are feeling angry or nervous.

2. Movement

The way you move your arms and legs such as walking quickly or slowly, standing, sitting or fidgeting, can all convey different messages to onlookers.

Example: Sitting still and paying attention in a meeting conveys respect and attention.

3. Posture

The way you sit or stand can also communicate your comfort level, professionalism and general disposition towards a person or conversation.

Example: Someone might slouch their shoulders if they feel tired, frustrated or disappointed.

4. Gestures

While gestures vary widely across communities, they are generally used both intentionally and unintentionally to convey information to others.

Example: Someone in the United States might display a “thumbs up” to communicate confirmation or that they feel positively about something.

5. Space

Creating or closing distance between yourself and the people around you can also convey messages about your comfort level, the importance of the conversation, your desire to support or connect with others and more.

Example: You might stand two to three feet away from a new contact to respect their boundaries.

6. Paralanguage:

Paralanguage includes the non-language elements of speech, such as your talking speed, pitch, intonation, volume and more.

Example: You might speak quickly if you are excited about something.

7. Facial expressions

One of the most common forms of nonverbal communication is facial expressions. Using the eyebrows, mouth, eyes and facial muscles to convey can be very effective when communicating both emotion and information.

Example: Someone might raise their eyebrows and open their eyes widely if they feel surprised.

8. Eye contact

Strategically using eye content (or lack of eye contact) is an extremely effective way to communicate your attention and interest.

Example: Looking away from someone and at the ground or your phone may convey disinterest or disrespect.

9. Touch

Some people also use touch as a form of communication. Most commonly, it is used to communicate support or comfort. This form of communication should be used sparingly and only when you know the receiving party is okay with it. It should never be used to convey anger, frustration or any other negative emotions.

Example: Placing your hand on a friend’s shoulder may convey support or empathy.

As negotiations near closure, skilled negotiators carefully observe for buying signals—verbal cues (“That sounds reasonable…”) and non-verbal cues (nodding, smiling, leaning forward). These indicate readiness to agree and confirm whether it is the right time to close. At this stage, both sides usually stop gathering data or building rapport, as the focus is on confirming alignment and avoiding last-minute derailments. Closing too early may risk missing concessions, but delaying risks cooling momentum. Recognising buying signals ensures closure occurs at the optimal point, aligning with preparation and tactical awareness.

When a buyer’s purchase represents asignificant portion of a supplier’s revenue, it increases the buyer’s leverage. The supplier has a vested interest in maintaining the relationship and is more likely to make concessions to preserve the account.

“Buyer power increases when the buyer represents a large portion of the supplier's total sales. This dependency increases the buyer’s ability to influence terms.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.3 - Bargaining Power Analysis)

The assumption is false, because when a procurement professional negotiates on behalf of his employer, he brings the power of his organisation (its brand, reputation and purchasing spend) as well his own personal power (that which is embedded within him) to the negotiation.

From a negotiation perspective, both organisational and personal power have the ability to influence the behaviours of other or the cause of event. This power is clearly core to negotiation, and of enormous important in seeking to achieve the objectives.

Tradeables—alternative offers or concessions—are typically introduced during thebargainingstage of the negotiation. This is when both parties discuss and exchange proposals to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

During the proposing stage, parties move toward agreement by narrowing down a wide range of potential options. This helps focus the negotiation and aligns both parties toward practical, mutual outcomes. It's an essential step to keep the process structured and productive.

Elasticity refers to the responsiveness of quantity demanded or quantity supplied to a change in price or another factor:

The price of a product can be described as being elastic if a small change in price leads to a big change in demand.

The price of a product can be described as being inelastic if a big change in price leads to a small change in demand.

The formulae of elasticity of demand is known as the following:

Text Description automatically generated with low confidence

Many commercial negotiations could be considered routine or just not worth the investment for buyers, and using the phone can make more sense and can be more immediate.

LO 2, AC 2.4

LO 2, AC 2.1

Win–lose strategies focus on gaining advantage at the other party’s expense. Forcing them to lower their resistance point or persuading them the deal is their best option are classic distributive tactics. Empathy, compromise, and creativity belong to integrative approaches aimed at mutual benefit. Recognising these distinctions ensures negotiators adopt the right strategy for the relationship type and context.

Different questioning styles can be used to elicit desired responses:

Text Description automatically generated

Legitimate power comes from formal authority and organisational backing, making it a credible and sustainable leverage source in negotiations. Personality power or reliance on colleagues and friends lacks long-term weight and may not influence suppliers strategically. Buyers who use legitimate power, backed by governance and authority, negotiate from a position of credibility and professionalism, reinforcing stronger outcomes.

In the opening phase, parties should confirm understanding and get the issues on the table.

The testing phase is an information gathering stage where the hypothesis and assumption you have made in the planning stage can be tested or confirmed or disproved.

Opening questions (those that start with 'what', 'how', 'why') are used at the opening and testing stages to uncover needs and underlying motives, and to allow the buyer to get a feel of what is in store in the negotiation.

Probing questions are also useful to check that the supplier fully understand their offering, as well as your needs, and can also be used to communicate to the supplier that you know this category well. These questions are typically useful at the opening and testing stages.

With a collaborative supplier, the appropriate approach is Win–Win (integrative). Both sides aim to create savings while maintaining partnership value. Win–Lose would damage collaboration, while Lose–Lose sacrifices value on both sides. Win–Perceived Win is based on optics rather than actual balance. By adopting a win–win approach, Maria ensures sustainable cost reductions while protecting critical NHS supplier relationships.

Knowing supplier's fixed and variable costs is beneficial for the buyer in a negotiation. With these insights, the buyer would know the volume at which the supplier reaches break-even points and then offers significant discount due to economies of scale.

The collaborative strategy (win-win, integrative) focuses on joint problem-solving, transparency, and trust. It is best when long-term relationships are critical, and both parties see value in mutual success. By contrast, competitive (win-lose) is adversarial, accommodative sacrifices one party’s interests, and avoidance seeks disengagement. Collaborative strategies are common in partnerships, innovation projects, and sustainable procurement. They require sharing information, identifying tradeables, and aligning objectives beyond price to long-term outcomes.

Effective listening is crucial in integrative negotiations because it promotes understanding and collaboration. By actively listening, parties can identify shared interests and address concerns, which supports the goal of reaching mutually beneficial solutions. This is a key component in CIPS guidelines on successful integrative negotiation practices.

Hypothetical (“What if…”) questions test possibilities and invite creative options without binding either side. They help probe interests and packages while keeping commitment provisional.

Referent power is based on personal relationships and the respect or admiration one earns within an organization. Given Mike’s positive relationships and his rapport with team members and other departments, he is most likely to have referent power. This power type is influential in negotiation as people are more willing to work with someone they respect, as outlined in CIPS power dynamics in negotiation.

Closed questions are designed to elicit specific, factual responses — typically “yes” or “no” or a brief piece of information. These are particularly useful when verifying details during negotiation. For example, asking “Did you receive the revised schedule on Monday?” ensures clarity and reduces ambiguity.

Bargaining is the negotiation stage where tradeables are typically introduced and discussed. During this phase, both parties exchange offers and concessions, using tradeables such as lead times and order quantities to find a mutually acceptable agreement. This aligns with CIPS's guidance on the stages of negotiation.

An oligopoly exists when there are small number of producers that exert a significant influence in the market. Oligopoly's main characteristics are discussed as follows:

- Interdependence

The most important feature of oligopoly is the interdependence in decision¬-making of the few firms which comprise the industry. This is because when the number of competi¬tors is few, any change in price, output, product etc. by a firm will have a direct effect on the fortune of its rivals, which will then retaliate in changing their own prices, output or products as the case may be.

- Importance of advertising and selling costs

A direct effect of interdependence of oligopolists is that the various firms have to employ various aggressive and defensive marketing weapons to gain a greater share in the market or to prevent a fall in their market share. For this various firms have to incur a good deal of costs on advertising and on other measures of sales promotion. Therefore, there is a great importance of advertising and selling costs under conditions of market situation characterised by oligopoly

- Group behaviour

Another important feature of oligopoly is that for the proper solution to the problem of determination of price and output under, it analysis of group behaviour is impor-tant.

- Indeterminateness of demand curve facing an oligopolist

In this question, 'Prices in oligopoly are predicted to fluctuate widely and frequently' is an incorrect statement as producers in oligopoly often try to set up price. Prices fluctuate more frequently in perfect competition.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Other stakeholders, including directors, IT, and finance departments, often have an interest in procurement negotiations, particularly when the contract impacts strategic objectives, IT infrastructure, or organizational operations. This broader stakeholder involvement aligns with CIPS’s emphasis on inclusive stakeholder management in procurement to ensure well-rounded decision-making.

External factors in pricing decisions include Competition in the market (A) and Customer perception of value (D). These factors are outside the supplier's direct control but influence pricing strategies to remain competitive and meet customer expectations:

Competition in the market (A): Market competition dictates how much a supplier can charge without losing business to competitors.

Customer perception of value (D): How customers perceive the product’s worth affects its acceptable price range.

These factors are considered external as they relate to market dynamics rather than internal cost structures, according to CIPS's guidance on pricing influences.

Becoming a preferred customer to supplier's perspective can increase the purchaser's leverage in negotiation. Beside the size of buying organisation or its spend, the following may be sufficient to differentiate the buyer from other buying organisations:

Simple procurement processes: Using SRM technology may help to simplify the process

Simple contracting processes

Clear and concise documentation: Reduced paperwork helps both supplier and buyer save their time and resources.

Absence of onerous supplier terms and conditions

On-time payment

Transparent processes: Unclear tender award criteria can be seen as opaque. Suppliers who attended the tendering processes cannot know the reasons why their bids are rejected and hesitate to attend other tendering.

Ethical behaviour: Suppliers may prefer a buyer who adopts CSR policy because they can predict potential customer's behaviour. Demands for kickback are unethical behaviours.

Jayden's use ofeye contact to demonstrate understandingis a core element ofactive and effective listening. This technique includes not only listening to spoken words but also using non-verbal cues (e.g., nodding, eye contact) to confirm comprehension and engagement. Effective listening is essential to ensure that both parties feel heard and respected, which can de-escalate tension and improve outcomes.

“Effective listening involves verbal and non-verbal behaviours that show attentiveness. Maintaining eye contact, nodding, and reflecting key points show engagement and help in building rapport and trust.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.3 - Communication Techniques in Negotiation)

Giving positive group and individual feedback is easy, as is self-congratulation and, in many cases, it is hoped, this will be an accurate reflection on actual performance. When it comes to developmental or difficult feedback, it is only natural to want to move on and not reflect on the negative or developmental points, or why a negotiation did not achieve its objectives. But this is a mistake. The best learning opportunities come from reflection on what could be done better, and this can be achieved without blame, threat or condemnation. Everyone and every team will make mistakes and/or have areas where they could have improved. Clearly, if every reflection session concludes that an individual or team keeps making the same mistake, then there is a case to change roles or consider alternative approaches.

About Dos and Don'ts of reflection, you can refer here: https://offices.depaul.edu/human-resources/employee-relations/Documents/Self%20Assesement.pdf

For a private healthcare IT project, Senior Management (strategic decision-makers) and Software support developers (technical implementers) are the primary stakeholders. The general public and pharmaceutical suppliers are external parties not directly affected by the IT project outcomes. Identifying true stakeholders ensures effective engagement, reduces resistance, and aligns negotiation priorities with those who influence or are impacted by the decision. Misidentifying stakeholders risks ignoring critical voices, undermining project success and negotiation alignment.

Collaborating is both assertive and cooperative. When collaborating, an individual attempts to work with the other person to find a solution that fully satisfies the concerns of both. It involves digging into an issue to identify the underlying concerns of the two individuals and to find an alternative that meets both sets of concerns. Collaborating between two persons might take the form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each other’s insights, resolving some conditionthat would otherwise have them competing for resources, or confronting and trying to find a creative solution to an interpersonal problem.

There are 3 major costing methods:

Marginal costing

• Uses marginal cost of producing addition units

• Uses variable cost to derived a unit cost (does not include fixed cost)

• Fixed cost treated as a ‘period cost’ and deducted, as a total amount, from total contribution to profit for the period, in the firm’s profit and loss account

Absorption costing

• Calculates total cost of producing product

• In addition to variable cost, a fair proportion of fixed cost is allocated to (absorbed) each unit of output, as a fixed cost per unit

Activity based costing

• Similar to absorption costing but with fixed cost allocated to products on the basis of the cost of activities used in producing them

LO 2, AC 2.1

Variable costs fluctuate with production volume — e.g., raw materials and delivery costs. Fixed costs such as rent and insurance remain constant regardless of output. In negotiations, suppliers may inflate fixed cost allocations to justify pricing; buyers should differentiate between fixed and variable costs to challenge pricing more effectively. Recognising true variable costs also allows negotiating for volume-related discounts.